|
Date | Opponent | Result/Prediction | Record | Conf | Rating | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  Nov 28, 1988 | 6   | @ Syracuse | L | 66-91 | 0.3% | 0 - 1 | -1.1 | ||
  Dec 02, 1988 | 12   | @ Stanford | L | 45-90 | 1% | 0 - 2 | -24.3 | ||
  Dec 03, 1988 | 196   | Pacific | L | 76-90 | 22% | 0 - 3 | -18.4 | ||
  Dec 27, 1988 | 132   | @ SMU | L | 59-67 | 6% | 0 - 4 | -3.3 | ||
  Dec 29, 1988 | 4   | @ Duke | L | 59-94 | 0.3% | 0 - 5 | -10.4 | ||
  Jan 03, 1989 | 205   | @ Army | L | 79-95 | 15% | 0 - 6 | -17.5 | ||
  Jan 07, 1989 | 207   | Drexel | L | 84-91 | 38% | 0 - 7 | -16.5 | ||
  Jan 09, 1989 | 265   | @ Colgate | W | 75-65 | 35% | 1 - 7 | +1.5 | ||
  Jan 13, 1989 | 191   | @ Dartmouth | L | 55-80 | 12% | 1 - 8 | 0 - 1 | -24.9 | |
  Jan 14, 1989 | 258   | @ Harvard | L | 69-76 | 30% | 1 - 9 | 0 - 2 | -14.1 | |
  Jan 21, 1989 | 284   | Columbia | L | 55-60 | 74% | 1 - 10 | 0 - 3 | -24.3 | |
  Jan 23, 1989 | 186   | Lafayette | L | 46-64 | 32% | 1 - 11 | -25.6 | ||
  Jan 28, 1989 | 284   | Columbia | W | 61-54 | 74% | 2 - 11 | 1 - 3 | -12.3 | |
  Jan 30, 1989 | 161   | Bucknell | L | 67-69 | 24% | 2 - 12 | -7.0 | ||
  Feb 03, 1989 | 249   | @ Yale | L | 48-66 | 24% | 2 - 13 | 1 - 4 | -23.1 | |
  Feb 04, 1989 | 280   | @ Brown | L | 75-91 | 42% | 2 - 14 | 1 - 5 | -26.3 | |
  Feb 10, 1989 | 226   | Penn | W | 71-66 | 45% | 3 - 14 | 2 - 5 | -6.3 | |
  Feb 11, 1989 | 152   | Princeton | L | 49-60 | 22% | 3 - 15 | 2 - 6 | -15.5 | |
  Feb 17, 1989 | 258   | Harvard | W | 75-74 | 60% | 4 - 15 | 3 - 6 | -14.0 | |
  Feb 18, 1989 | 191   | Dartmouth | W | 80-64 | 32% | 5 - 15 | 4 - 6 | +8.2 | |
  Feb 24, 1989 | 152   | @ Princeton | L | 46-65 | 8% | 5 - 16 | 4 - 7 | -15.6 | |
  Feb 25, 1989 | 226   | @ Penn | W | 65-61 | 19% | 6 - 16 | 5 - 7 | +0.7 | |
  Mar 03, 1989 | 280   | Brown | W | 82-78 | 71% | 7 - 16 | 6 - 7 | -14.2 | |
  Mar 04, 1989 | 249   | Yale | W | 86-81 | 52% | 8 - 16 | 7 - 7 | -8.0 | |
Projected Record | 8 - 16 | 7 - 7 |