Dartmouth
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
124  Will Geoghegan JR 31:58
248  John Bleday JR 32:20
290  Jonathan Gault SR 32:26
292  Phil Royer SR 32:27
370  Dylan O'Sullivan SO 32:37
496  Curtis King FR 32:54
501  Steve Mangan JR 32:55
593  Silas Talbot SO 33:05
620  Henry Sterling JR 33:09
672  Brian Masterson FR 33:14
683  Mike Danaher SR 33:15
754  Adam Doherty SR 33:22
1,058  Anthony Anzvino FR 33:51
1,351  Peter Geithner FR 34:16
1,442  Matthew Pierce JR 34:24
1,552  Matt Klein FR 34:33
1,900  Will Callan SO 35:06
2,291  Tim Gorman FR 35:41
2,562  Kevin Stanko FR 36:19
2,890  Joe Carey SO 37:33
National Rank #41 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #4 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 15.7%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 1.9%


Regional Champion 1.3%
Top 5 in Regional 86.2%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Will Geoghegan John Bleday Jonathan Gault Phil Royer Dylan O'Sullivan Curtis King Steve Mangan Silas Talbot Henry Sterling Brian Masterson Mike Danaher
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 823 31:54 32:20 32:26 32:57 32:57 33:23 33:17 33:35 32:58
All New England Championship 10/07 1060 33:27 32:40 32:55 33:11
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 789 32:07 32:07 32:21 32:34 33:01 33:22
Brown University Rothernberg Invitational 10/19 1250
Ivy League Championships 10/27 725 31:53 32:41 31:58 32:35 32:44 32:21 33:17 33:07 33:18 33:26
Norhteast Region Championships 11/09 814 32:00 32:34 32:37 32:28 32:57 32:36 33:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 15.7% 26.1 601 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.2 2.0 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.0
Region Championship 100% 4.3 127 1.3 3.7 12.6 45.9 22.7 9.8 3.4 0.6



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Will Geoghegan 62.4% 106.3
John Bleday 24.7% 147.3
Jonathan Gault 19.0% 159.6
Phil Royer 18.6% 162.4
Dylan O'Sullivan 15.9% 185.4
Curtis King 15.7% 215.8
Steve Mangan 15.7% 220.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Will Geoghegan 10.6 1.0 3.2 4.4 5.5 5.8 5.9 6.2 5.1 5.4 4.6 5.2 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.6 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.3
John Bleday 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.7 4.1 4.3 4.2 3.9 4.0 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.1
Jonathan Gault 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.9 1.7 2.6 2.4 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.6
Phil Royer 26.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 2.0 1.9 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.0 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8
Dylan O'Sullivan 33.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.7 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.6 3.3 3.3
Curtis King 47.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8
Steve Mangan 48.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1.3% 100.0% 1.3 1.3 1
2 3.7% 100.0% 3.7 3.7 2
3 12.6% 83.5% 8.7 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.1 10.5 3
4 45.9% 0.3% 0.1 0.0 0.0 45.7 0.2 4
5 22.7% 22.7 5
6 9.8% 9.8 6
7 3.4% 3.4 7
8 0.6% 0.6 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 15.7% 1.3 3.7 8.7 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 84.3 5.0 10.7




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
North Carolina St. 20.7% 1.0 0.2
Penn State 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Providence 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Harvard 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 0.0% 3.0 0.0
Lehigh 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0