Grambling
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,528  Alfred Bartie FR 36:13
2,542  Deonte Pope JR 36:16
2,577  Trevor Gayten JR 36:21
2,852  Malik Wheeler FR 37:24
3,038  Darius Taylor JR 38:25
3,128  Lester Herbert SR 39:14
3,158  Stephone Leaks SO 39:32
3,195  Zoltan Riazzo SR 40:07
3,203  Dequainte Brown SR 40:17
3,301  Jahi Gikley FR 43:43
National Rank #277 of 311
South Central Region Rank #30 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Alfred Bartie Deonte Pope Trevor Gayten Malik Wheeler Darius Taylor Lester Herbert Stephone Leaks Zoltan Riazzo Dequainte Brown Jahi Gikley
Lois Davis Invitational 10/06 1443 35:49 36:51 36:21 35:53 38:27 38:22 40:49 43:07
Choctaw Open 10/13 1500 36:43 36:29 36:09 37:25 39:24 40:11 40:00 44:01
SWAC Championships 10/29 1474 36:01 35:45 36:39 37:54 38:29 39:24 39:32 40:21 43:45





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.7 852 0.1 0.4 1.4 4.5 18.1 75.1 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Alfred Bartie 153.5
Deonte Pope 154.7
Trevor Gayten 156.9
Malik Wheeler 179.4
Darius Taylor 201.5
Lester Herbert 211.1
Stephone Leaks 212.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 0.4% 0.4 26
27 1.4% 1.4 27
28 4.5% 4.5 28
29 18.1% 18.1 29
30 75.1% 75.1 30
31 0.4% 0.4 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0