Harvard
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
109  James Leakos JR 31:55
148  Maksim Korolev JR 32:04
392  Kurt Ruegg JR 32:40
421  Tom Purnell FR 32:44
678  Jakob Lindaas SR 33:14
687  Billy Gaudreau FR 33:15
752  Dan Milechman FR 33:22
859  Lukas Gemar FR 33:33
991  Will Geiken SO 33:45
1,085  Chris Allen FR 33:54
1,088  Sean Pohorence SR 33:55
1,092  Andy Gonzalez SO 33:55
1,386  Fred Ward SO 34:19
1,561  Stewart Richardson SR 34:34
1,682  Nephat Maritim FR 34:44
1,725  Konrad Surkont FR 34:49
1,960  Carl Ward SO 35:12
2,250  Connor Reck SO 35:36
2,275  Johnny Marvin FR 35:39
National Rank #52 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #5 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 2.0%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.1%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 44.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating James Leakos Maksim Korolev Kurt Ruegg Tom Purnell Jakob Lindaas Billy Gaudreau Dan Milechman Lukas Gemar Will Geiken Chris Allen Sean Pohorence
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 1048 32:23 32:42 33:42 33:47
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 697 31:42 31:24 32:49 32:38 33:34 32:51 32:52
Princeton Invitational 10/13 1155 33:34 33:41 33:38 33:33
Princeton Invitational (B) 10/13
Ivy League Championships 10/27 920 32:23 32:33 32:48 32:41 33:08 33:05 33:35 34:19 33:53 34:54 34:48
Norhteast Region Championships 11/09 774 31:49 31:38 33:02 33:04 34:25 32:50 33:34
NCAA Championship 11/17 32:58





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 2.0% 28.1 647 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5
Region Championship 100% 5.6 166 0.0 0.3 2.3 14.4 27.9 32.2 18.3 4.6 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
James Leakos 67.4% 97.9 0.0
Maksim Korolev 50.7% 118.0
Kurt Ruegg 2.4% 188.8
Tom Purnell 2.2% 183.0
Jakob Lindaas 2.0% 233.0
Billy Gaudreau 2.0% 238.5
Dan Milechman 2.0% 243.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
James Leakos 9.2 1.9 5.2 6.4 6.5 5.8 6.9 6.0 5.2 5.0 4.4 4.2 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.4 2.9 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.1
Maksim Korolev 13.2 0.2 1.2 2.2 3.2 4.0 4.2 4.9 5.4 5.0 5.4 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.0 3.8 3.2 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.3 1.9 2.0 1.8
Kurt Ruegg 35.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.5
Tom Purnell 39.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.6 2.0
Jakob Lindaas 64.7
Billy Gaudreau 65.1
Dan Milechman 72.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1
2 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 2
3 2.3% 69.6% 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.6 3
4 14.4% 0.8% 0.1 0.0 14.3 0.1 4
5 27.9% 27.9 5
6 32.2% 32.2 6
7 18.3% 18.3 7
8 4.6% 4.6 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 2.0% 0.0 0.3 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.0 0.3 1.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
North Carolina St. 20.7% 1.0 0.2
Dartmouth 5.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 4.6% 1.0 0.0
Penn State 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Providence 0.4% 1.0 0.0
North Carolina 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.3
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0