Iona
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
25  Mitch Goose SR 31:16
68  Matt Gillespie JR 31:40
80  Matthew Bayley SR 31:47
130  Daniel Clorley JR 31:58
163  Jake Byrne SO 32:06
396  Andrew Kowalsky SO 32:40
456  Mike O'Dowd FR 32:49
531  Ethan Heywood SO 33:00
588  Christopher Stogsdill JR 33:05
664  Jimmy Tarsnane JR 33:13
1,087  Colin Culhane SR 33:54
1,119  Quinn Raseman SO 33:56
1,149  Michael Champagne SO 33:59
1,197  Otis Ubriaco FR 34:03
1,479  Nickolaus Lachman SO 34:27
1,845  Brendan Farrell JR 35:02
2,099  Sean Gorham FR 35:25
2,211  Craig Murphy SR 35:33
2,848  Reed Kochanek SO 37:23
2,925  Robert Glowacky FR 37:46
National Rank #11 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #1 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 98.1%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 1.2%
Top 10 at Nationals 10.8%
Top 20 at Nationals 60.5%


Regional Champion 20.7%
Top 5 in Regional 99.6%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Mitch Goose Matt Gillespie Matthew Bayley Daniel Clorley Jake Byrne Andrew Kowalsky Mike O'Dowd Ethan Heywood Christopher Stogsdill Jimmy Tarsnane Colin Culhane
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 330 31:15 31:31 31:18 31:48 31:53 32:32 32:46 32:53 33:56
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/05 1147 32:25
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 301 31:13 30:59 31:33 31:34 32:03 32:17 33:36
Princeton Invitational 10/13 1105 32:43 33:08 34:04
Princeton Invitational (B) 10/13
MAAC Championships 10/27 827 32:04 32:21 33:51 32:28 32:34 33:00 33:01 33:01 33:22 33:45
Norhteast Region Championships 11/09 476 31:26 31:58 31:49 31:52 33:25 32:09 33:22
NCAA Championship 11/17 770 30:59 32:39 32:28 32:31 33:35 33:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 98.1% 18.3 458 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.7 2.8 3.6 4.2 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.0 5.1 5.0 5.3 5.3 4.4 3.9 3.7 2.6 2.8 2.4 1.4 0.8
Region Championship 100% 2.4 74 20.7 33.6 35.5 8.1 1.9 0.4 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mitch Goose 99.9% 29.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.7 2.2 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.1 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.4 2.1
Matt Gillespie 99.0% 66.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4
Daniel Clorley 98.2% 110.2
Jake Byrne 98.1% 129.8
Andrew Kowalsky 98.1% 210.2
Mike O'Dowd 98.1% 223.5
Ethan Heywood 98.1% 234.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mitch Goose 1.0 69.7 9.6 4.6 3.2 2.7 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Matt Gillespie 3.7 8.5 23.8 11.4 9.1 6.0 5.4 4.6 4.3 3.5 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3
Daniel Clorley 10.6 0.4 2.4 4.9 5.8 5.1 5.5 6.0 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.1 4.2 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.1
Jake Byrne 14.8 0.0 0.3 1.1 2.0 2.5 3.8 3.9 4.6 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.4 4.3 3.9 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 1.9 1.9
Andrew Kowalsky 36.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.9 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.8
Mike O'Dowd 43.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.2 1.0
Ethan Heywood 51.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 20.7% 100.0% 20.7 20.7 1
2 33.6% 100.0% 33.6 33.6 2
3 35.5% 100.0% 35.2 0.2 0.0 35.5 3
4 8.1% 100.0% 7.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 8.1 4
5 1.9% 21.5% 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.4 5
6 0.4% 0.4 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 98.1% 20.7 33.6 35.2 7.6 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.9 54.2 43.9




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Wisconsin 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Texas 100.0% 2.0 2.0
Princeton 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Arkansas 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Northern Arizona 99.9% 1.0 1.0
Oklahoma 99.8% 1.0 1.0
Michigan 99.8% 1.0 1.0
Syracuse 99.7% 1.0 1.0
Georgia 99.2% 2.0 2.0
Eastern Kentucky 98.9% 1.0 1.0
Indiana 98.6% 1.0 1.0
New Mexico 98.4% 1.0 1.0
Columbia 98.4% 2.0 2.0
Portland 92.2% 1.0 0.9
Notre Dame 88.9% 1.0 0.9
UCLA 84.5% 1.0 0.8
Virginia 82.0% 1.0 0.8
Iowa State 53.5% 1.0 0.5
Texas A&M 52.7% 1.0 0.5
Kansas 41.8% 1.0 0.4
Arizona State 38.4% 1.0 0.4
North Carolina St. 20.7% 1.0 0.2
Minnesota 10.7% 1.0 0.1
Washington 7.0% 1.0 0.1
Dartmouth 5.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 4.6% 2.0 0.1
Illinois 2.5% 1.0 0.0
Penn State 0.8% 2.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.5% 2.0 0.0
Providence 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Louisville 0.3% 1.0 0.0
North Carolina 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 21.8
Minimum 16.0
Maximum 28.0