Kansas State
Men -
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
1,001 |
Fernando Roman |
SO |
33:47 |
1,109 |
Ryan Hershner |
JR |
33:56 |
1,427 |
Kyle Hanson |
SR |
34:23 |
1,934 |
Lane Porter |
SR |
35:09 |
1,973 |
Logan Smith |
SO |
35:13 |
2,043 |
Blake Goodin |
FR |
35:20 |
2,044 |
Daniel Worthington |
FR |
35:20 |
2,258 |
Lucas Demott |
FR |
35:37 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
3.5% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Fernando Roman |
Ryan Hershner |
Kyle Hanson |
Lane Porter |
Logan Smith |
Blake Goodin |
Daniel Worthington |
Lucas Demott |
Rim Rock Farm Collegiate Classic |
09/29 |
1220 |
33:31 |
33:55 |
34:18 |
35:32 |
35:11 |
34:54 |
35:50 |
35:25 |
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) |
10/13 |
1250 |
33:47 |
33:59 |
35:21 |
35:33 |
35:43 |
35:28 |
34:58 |
35:15 |
Big 12 Championships |
10/27 |
1220 |
33:34 |
34:05 |
34:21 |
35:42 |
34:54 |
34:59 |
35:46 |
35:38 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/09 |
1216 |
34:56 |
33:41 |
33:53 |
34:26 |
|
36:43 |
34:37 |
37:05 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
25.2 |
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
3.7 |
5.9 |
9.2 |
13.2 |
16.5 |
17.0 |
14.8 |
10.8 |
5.3 |
0.1 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Fernando Roman |
98.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Hershner |
107.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Hanson |
133.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lane Porter |
177.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logan Smith |
180.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake Goodin |
186.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Worthington |
186.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
5.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
9.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
13.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
16.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
17.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
14.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
27 |
28 |
10.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
5.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
29 |
30 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |