Oregon
Men -
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
24 |
Trevor Dunbar |
SR |
31:14 |
74 |
Parker Stinson |
JR |
31:45 |
201 |
Matthew Melancon |
|
32:14 |
259 |
Ben DeJarnette |
JR |
32:21 |
271 |
Cole Watson |
SO |
32:23 |
322 |
Ryan Pickering |
SO |
32:31 |
340 |
Daniel Winn |
SO |
32:33 |
385 |
Jeramy Elkaim |
SO |
32:40 |
510 |
Chris Brewer |
FR |
32:57 |
721 |
Mac Fleet |
JR |
33:19 |
775 |
Mitchell Hunt |
JR |
33:26 |
887 |
Chad Noelle |
FR |
33:36 |
903 |
Colby Alexander |
SO |
33:38 |
1,380 |
Tim Costin |
JR |
34:18 |
2,335 |
Joseph Holvey |
|
35:47 |
|
National Rank |
#23 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#4 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
87.7% |
Most Likely Finish |
20th at Nationals |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.8% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
7.7% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
51.0% |
Regional Champion |
7.3% |
Top 5 in Regional |
87.4% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Trevor Dunbar |
Parker Stinson |
Matthew Melancon |
Ben DeJarnette |
Cole Watson |
Ryan Pickering |
Daniel Winn |
Jeramy Elkaim |
Chris Brewer |
Mac Fleet |
Mitchell Hunt |
Oregon Dellinger Invitational |
09/29 |
565 |
31:32 |
32:01 |
32:40 |
31:46 |
32:09 |
32:45 |
32:34 |
|
33:06 |
|
33:25 |
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) |
10/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32:29 |
|
|
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) |
10/13 |
397 |
31:06 |
31:11 |
32:15 |
31:48 |
32:02 |
32:46 |
32:08 |
|
|
|
|
Pac-12 Championships |
10/27 |
480 |
31:02 |
31:02 |
32:10 |
33:21 |
32:26 |
32:14 |
33:08 |
33:55 |
33:15 |
|
|
West Region Championships |
11/09 |
621 |
31:34 |
31:44 |
32:18 |
32:58 |
33:27 |
32:37 |
|
32:18 |
|
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/17 |
607 |
31:15 |
34:06 |
31:53 |
32:21 |
|
32:17 |
|
32:26 |
|
33:20 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
87.7% |
18.9 |
468 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
5.0 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
4.6 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.1 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
0.8 |
Region Championship |
100% |
3.6 |
124 |
7.3 |
20.2 |
22.4 |
22.3 |
15.3 |
7.8 |
3.6 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Trevor Dunbar |
99.3% |
27.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
Parker Stinson |
89.5% |
75.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Matthew Melancon |
87.7% |
149.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ben DeJarnette |
87.7% |
167.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cole Watson |
87.7% |
170.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Pickering |
87.7% |
188.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Winn |
87.7% |
195.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Trevor Dunbar |
3.6 |
|
1.1 |
37.9 |
19.5 |
12.3 |
7.2 |
4.8 |
3.3 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Parker Stinson |
10.8 |
|
0.0 |
0.4 |
3.2 |
5.8 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
5.8 |
5.6 |
4.9 |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
Matthew Melancon |
30.9 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
Ben DeJarnette |
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
Cole Watson |
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
Ryan Pickering |
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
Daniel Winn |
51.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
7.3% |
100.0% |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
1 |
2 |
20.2% |
100.0% |
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
2 |
3 |
22.4% |
98.5% |
| |
0.1 |
0.8 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
|
22.0 |
3 |
4 |
22.3% |
97.6% |
| |
|
|
0.7 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
2.5 |
1.9 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
|
21.8 |
4 |
5 |
15.3% |
86.4% |
| |
|
|
0.0 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
|
13.2 |
5 |
6 |
7.8% |
39.6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
4.7 |
|
3.1 |
6 |
7 |
3.6% |
3.9% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
3.4 |
|
0.1 |
7 |
8 |
1.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
87.7% |
7.3 |
20.2 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
3.6 |
7.3 |
9.2 |
8.4 |
7.3 |
6.0 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
12.3 |
27.5 |
60.3 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Florida State |
100.0% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Tulsa |
97.5% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
UCLA |
84.5% |
1.0 |
0.8 |
Georgetown |
80.3% |
1.0 |
0.8 |
Virginia Tech |
59.0% |
1.0 |
0.6 |
Arizona State |
38.4% |
1.0 |
0.4 |
Villanova |
34.8% |
1.0 |
0.3 |
Florida |
12.5% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Duke |
11.7% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Washington |
7.0% |
2.0 |
0.1 |
William and Mary |
0.9% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Washington St. |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Louisville |
0.3% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
McNeese State |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Boise State |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Lehigh |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
2.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
9.0 |