Pepperdine
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,966  Jonathan Rahaeuser SR 35:13
2,330  Jordan Scandlyn FR 35:46
2,415  Jesse Aston JR 35:58
3,256  Mark Vega FR 41:44
3,279  Chris Hostetler FR 42:16
National Rank #290 of 311
West Region Rank #32 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jonathan Rahaeuser Jordan Scandlyn Jesse Aston Mark Vega Chris Hostetler
CSUN Invitational 10/13 1618 35:08 35:57 36:36 42:21
Titan Invitational 10/19 1760 36:45 36:45 36:46 41:35
WCC Championships 10/27 1592 35:18 35:47 35:20 41:46 42:31
West Region Championships 11/09 34:58 35:31 36:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.0 996 0.1 4.1 26.9 34.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jonathan Rahaeuser 175.9
Jordan Scandlyn 188.6
Jesse Aston 191.8
Mark Vega 218.3
Chris Hostetler 219.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 4.1% 4.1 29
30 26.9% 26.9 30
31 34.9% 34.9 31
32 34.0% 34.0 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0