South Alabama
Men -
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
1,019 |
Patrick Rohr |
FR |
33:48 |
1,378 |
Ronny Wilson |
SO |
34:18 |
1,502 |
Robert Mann |
SO |
34:29 |
1,537 |
Alex Shields |
JR |
34:32 |
1,796 |
Justin Housley |
SO |
34:58 |
1,957 |
Ian Bordelon |
SO |
35:12 |
2,444 |
Buddy Soto |
FR |
36:02 |
3,065 |
Corey Cotter |
FR |
38:42 |
|
National Rank |
#191 of 311 |
South Region Rank |
#17 of 42 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
16th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.7% |
Top 20 in Regional |
82.9% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Patrick Rohr |
Ronny Wilson |
Robert Mann |
Alex Shields |
Justin Housley |
Ian Bordelon |
Buddy Soto |
Corey Cotter |
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) |
09/29 |
1219 |
33:40 |
34:11 |
34:30 |
34:35 |
35:04 |
34:56 |
35:23 |
|
Choctaw Open |
10/13 |
1228 |
33:59 |
34:05 |
|
34:12 |
35:21 |
34:36 |
36:02 |
|
Sun Belt Conference Championships |
10/27 |
1256 |
33:46 |
34:36 |
|
34:13 |
34:52 |
36:17 |
36:19 |
38:42 |
South Region Championships |
11/09 |
1251 |
33:54 |
34:21 |
|
35:13 |
34:40 |
35:17 |
36:16 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
17.4 |
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
3.3 |
4.7 |
7.3 |
10.5 |
12.6 |
12.5 |
11.4 |
10.2 |
8.2 |
6.1 |
4.6 |
3.6 |
1.9 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Patrick Rohr |
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Ronny Wilson |
86.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mann |
96.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Shields |
100.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin Housley |
128.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Bordelon |
141.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buddy Soto |
183.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
1.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
3.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
4.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
10.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
12.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
12.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
11.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
10.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
8.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
4.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |