UL-Lafayette
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,248  Cole Stafford FR 34:07
1,521  Zach France SR 34:31
1,551  Matt Rice FR 34:33
2,181  Trey Bonin FR 35:29
2,438  Scott Brewster FR 36:01
2,535  Corbette Ourso FR 36:15
3,024  Courtland Privat SO 38:20
3,179  Patrick Spiller JR 39:56
National Rank #222 of 311
South Central Region Rank #17 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 99.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Cole Stafford Zach France Matt Rice Trey Bonin Scott Brewster Corbette Ourso Courtland Privat Patrick Spiller
McNeese Cowboy Stampeded 09/29 1287 35:00 34:28 34:26 35:48 36:51 35:46 37:16 39:14
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 1307 33:48 35:42 34:59 35:40 36:10
Sun Belt Conference Championships 10/27 1260 34:04 35:00 33:55 35:54 35:05 38:11 39:30 40:34
South Central Region Championships 11/09 1327 34:14 34:34 35:25 37:12 35:58





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.2 557 0.0 0.2 6.1 73.4 14.7 3.8 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cole Stafford 77.9
Zach France 95.8
Matt Rice 97.7
Trey Bonin 131.3
Scott Brewster 147.7
Corbette Ourso 154.3
Courtland Privat 200.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 6.1% 6.1 16
17 73.4% 73.4 17
18 14.7% 14.7 18
19 3.8% 3.8 19
20 1.2% 1.2 20
21 0.4% 0.4 21
22 0.2% 0.2 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0