Alabama
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
617  Parker Deuel SO 33:14
631  Matt Airola JR 33:15
1,090  Conner Thompson FR 33:59
1,120  Andrew Faris SO 34:01
1,447  Gil Walton SO 34:27
1,492  Payton Ballard FR 34:31
1,715  Matt Joyner JR 34:50
1,773  Eric Sivill SO 34:56
2,124  Evan Prizy FR 35:32
National Rank #144 of 311
South Region Rank #13 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 13.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Parker Deuel Matt Airola Conner Thompson Andrew Faris Gil Walton Payton Ballard Matt Joyner Eric Sivill Evan Prizy
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1172 33:32 33:23 34:09 34:24 33:56 34:26 34:50 34:09 34:31
SEC Championships 11/01 1145 33:08 33:06 33:57 33:59 34:25 34:26 34:57 36:58
South Region Championships 11/15 1161 33:07 33:21 33:51 33:47 35:17 34:49 35:53





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 13.7 357 0.1 0.7 2.2 4.2 6.3 9.2 10.3 12.1 13.1 13.3 12.7 8.9 4.8 1.9 0.4 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Parker Deuel 39.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8
Matt Airola 41.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.7
Conner Thompson 79.2
Andrew Faris 82.9
Gil Walton 108.0
Payton Ballard 112.3
Matt Joyner 127.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.7% 0.7 7
8 2.2% 2.2 8
9 4.2% 4.2 9
10 6.3% 6.3 10
11 9.2% 9.2 11
12 10.3% 10.3 12
13 12.1% 12.1 13
14 13.1% 13.1 14
15 13.3% 13.3 15
16 12.7% 12.7 16
17 8.9% 8.9 17
18 4.8% 4.8 18
19 1.9% 1.9 19
20 0.4% 0.4 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0