Auburn
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
59 |
Ty McCormack |
JR |
31:38 |
211 |
Kane Grimster |
JR |
32:14 |
360 |
Niklas Buhner |
JR |
32:41 |
455 |
Samuel Mueller |
SR |
32:55 |
851 |
Francisco Hernandez |
JR |
33:37 |
1,413 |
Jason Miller |
SR |
34:24 |
1,845 |
Andrew Scott |
SR |
35:02 |
2,496 |
Hunter Hayes |
SR |
36:23 |
|
National Rank |
#54 of 311 |
South Region Rank |
#4 of 41 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
14.9% |
Most Likely Finish |
4th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.1% |
Regional Champion |
4.1% |
Top 5 in Regional |
91.5% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Ty McCormack |
Kane Grimster |
Niklas Buhner |
Samuel Mueller |
Francisco Hernandez |
Jason Miller |
Andrew Scott |
Hunter Hayes |
Virginia Panorama Farms Invitational |
09/28 |
722 |
31:46 |
32:10 |
32:24 |
32:11 |
33:06 |
34:36 |
34:20 |
|
Alabama Crimson Classic |
10/18 |
919 |
32:08 |
32:33 |
32:30 |
33:08 |
33:40 |
34:35 |
34:47 |
36:23 |
SEC Championships |
11/01 |
874 |
31:40 |
31:53 |
33:05 |
34:28 |
34:11 |
34:27 |
37:40 |
|
South Region Championships |
11/15 |
860 |
31:50 |
32:23 |
32:54 |
32:34 |
33:38 |
33:52 |
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/23 |
|
31:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
14.9% |
29.4 |
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
2.9 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
Region Championship |
100% |
3.9 |
130 |
4.1 |
10.3 |
18.1 |
32.8 |
26.1 |
6.6 |
1.5 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Ty McCormack |
96.1% |
61.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
Kane Grimster |
47.7% |
140.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Niklas Buhner |
16.0% |
190.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel Mueller |
14.9% |
210.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francisco Hernandez |
14.9% |
242.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Miller |
15.4% |
250.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Scott |
17.0% |
251.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Ty McCormack |
2.2 |
23.0 |
24.3 |
18.1 |
10.8 |
6.7 |
4.4 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Kane Grimster |
8.6 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
2.5 |
5.5 |
7.7 |
9.7 |
9.6 |
9.2 |
8.3 |
7.2 |
6.0 |
4.9 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Niklas Buhner |
18.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
4.3 |
5.2 |
5.5 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
5.1 |
5.0 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
Samuel Mueller |
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
Francisco Hernandez |
59.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
Jason Miller |
105.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Scott |
135.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
4.1% |
100.0% |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
1 |
2 |
10.3% |
100.0% |
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
2 |
3 |
18.1% |
2.3% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
17.7 |
|
0.4 |
3 |
4 |
32.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
26.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
6.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
1.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Total |
100% |
14.9% |
4.1 |
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
85.1 |
14.4 |
0.4 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Tennessee |
7.8% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |