Cincinnati
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
391 |
Evan Baum |
SR |
32:46 |
823 |
Oliver Book |
SR |
33:35 |
1,014 |
Kevin Fink |
JR |
33:52 |
1,235 |
Eric Hauser |
SR |
34:10 |
1,258 |
Jeffrey Griffiths |
SR |
34:12 |
1,454 |
Ian Silver |
SO |
34:27 |
1,461 |
Greg Sanders |
JR |
34:28 |
1,835 |
Anthony Car |
FR |
35:02 |
1,906 |
Jacob Franklin |
SR |
35:09 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.8% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Evan Baum |
Oliver Book |
Kevin Fink |
Eric Hauser |
Jeffrey Griffiths |
Ian Silver |
Greg Sanders |
Anthony Car |
Jacob Franklin |
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) |
10/19 |
1133 |
32:46 |
33:30 |
33:24 |
|
34:11 |
|
34:31 |
34:59 |
34:49 |
AAC Championships |
11/02 |
1142 |
32:52 |
33:40 |
33:35 |
33:57 |
36:19 |
34:45 |
34:14 |
35:06 |
35:39 |
Great Lakes Region Championships |
11/15 |
1128 |
32:40 |
33:36 |
35:48 |
34:25 |
33:30 |
34:15 |
34:43 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
15.1 |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.8 |
3.4 |
7.2 |
10.4 |
13.6 |
17.9 |
19.7 |
17.4 |
7.0 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Evan Baum |
0.5% |
170.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Evan Baum |
42.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Oliver Book |
79.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Fink |
93.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Hauser |
109.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Griffiths |
111.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Silver |
126.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Sanders |
127.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
3.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
7.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
10.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
13.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
17.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
19.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
17.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
7.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |