Columbia
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
47  Nico Composto SR 31:30
95  Jake Sienko SR 31:49
100  Daniel Everett JR 31:50
116  John Gregorek SR 31:55
266  Jack Boyle FR 32:26
397  Ben Golestan SO 32:46
405  Joe Kotran SR 32:47
535  Tait Rutherford SO 33:04
688  Paul Ross JR 33:20
739  Daniel Nestor JR 33:27
864  Mark Violone SO 33:39
903  Dustin Wilson SO 33:43
1,072  Casey Adams JR 33:57
1,143  Rob Napolitano FR 34:03
1,146  Ben Eversole JR 34:03
1,162  Ben Ritz FR 34:05
1,187  Shane Gianetti JR 34:07
1,365  Tyler Gibbons SO 34:20
1,414  Jonah Hanig FR 34:24
1,500  Jack Macauley FR 34:32
1,549  Jack Baisley FR 34:37
1,660  Jon Harper SO 34:46
2,298  Alex Brown FR 35:56
National Rank #16 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #3 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 98.4%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Nationals


National Champion 0.1%
Top 5 at Nationals 4.1%
Top 10 at Nationals 21.3%
Top 20 at Nationals 68.4%


Regional Champion 19.1%
Top 5 in Regional 98.3%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nico Composto Jake Sienko Daniel Everett John Gregorek Jack Boyle Ben Golestan Joe Kotran Tait Rutherford Paul Ross Daniel Nestor Mark Violone
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/04 443 31:36 31:36 31:37 31:50 32:19 32:33 33:25 35:35
NYC Metro Championships 10/11 1194 33:56
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/19 473 31:50 31:39 31:42 31:42 32:17 33:00 33:22 33:07
Princeton Invitational 10/19 1101 33:17 32:57 33:01
Ivy League Championships 11/02 542 31:43 32:13 31:46 31:44 32:23 32:30 32:46 32:50 33:32 33:13 33:51
Northeast Region Championships 11/15 551 31:50 31:46 31:50 32:08 33:08 32:32 32:18
NCAA Championship 11/23 705 31:10 32:01 33:04 32:45 32:33 33:55 32:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 98.4% 16.5 426 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.4 1.6 2.8 3.3 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.5 4.6 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.7 4.3 4.5 4.6 3.8 3.9 3.5 2.8 2.8 2.0 1.2 0.8 0.2
Region Championship 100% 2.9 84 19.1 22.7 25.4 18.6 12.5 1.6 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nico Composto 99.7% 46.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6
Jake Sienko 98.8% 88.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2
Daniel Everett 98.8% 90.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1
John Gregorek 98.6% 103.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Jack Boyle 98.4% 177.3
Ben Golestan 98.4% 211.5
Joe Kotran 98.4% 212.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nico Composto 4.2 3.0 16.6 18.0 10.5 7.5 5.9 4.7 4.6 3.2 3.3 2.5 2.6 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.5
Jake Sienko 11.7 0.0 0.7 2.7 4.8 5.3 5.6 5.6 6.1 6.0 5.1 5.0 4.4 4.9 4.2 3.5 3.7 3.4 2.9 2.7 2.2 2.1 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.5
Daniel Everett 12.0 0.0 0.7 2.7 4.1 5.3 5.4 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.2 4.9 4.4 4.5 4.2 3.5 3.8 3.5 2.7 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.4 1.7 1.7 1.4
John Gregorek 14.4 0.2 0.7 2.1 2.7 3.8 4.4 5.0 4.8 5.4 5.4 4.8 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.4 3.7 3.5 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.4
Jack Boyle 31.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.8 2.5 3.5 3.3 3.7 3.4
Ben Golestan 44.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6
Joe Kotran 45.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 19.1% 100.0% 19.1 19.1 1
2 22.7% 100.0% 22.7 22.7 2
3 25.4% 100.0% 21.3 4.0 0.1 0.0 25.4 3
4 18.6% 99.2% 5.5 2.1 0.9 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 18.5 4
5 12.5% 92.1% 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.9 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.0 11.5 5
6 1.6% 77.2% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.2 6
7 0.1% 14.3% 0.0 0.1 0.0 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 98.4% 19.1 22.7 21.3 9.5 3.2 1.5 1.6 2.7 3.5 3.5 3.3 2.3 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.6 41.8 56.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Arkansas 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Texas 99.9% 1.0 1.0
Indiana 99.6% 1.0 1.0
Michigan 99.5% 1.0 1.0
Eastern Kentucky 99.4% 1.0 1.0
Syracuse 98.9% 1.0 1.0
Princeton 98.3% 2.0 2.0
North Carolina 96.8% 1.0 1.0
Tulsa 95.9% 1.0 1.0
Notre Dame 95.9% 2.0 1.9
New Mexico 93.9% 1.0 0.9
Providence 91.6% 1.0 0.9
Colorado St. 72.5% 1.0 0.7
Air Force 68.6% 1.0 0.7
Florida State 67.8% 1.0 0.7
Harvard 65.7% 2.0 1.3
Virginia 64.2% 1.0 0.6
Florida 59.3% 1.0 0.6
Georgia 55.0% 1.0 0.6
Dartmouth 23.0% 2.0 0.5
Georgetown 17.7% 1.0 0.2
Minnesota 17.1% 2.0 0.3
Washington 10.2% 1.0 0.1
Arizona State 8.9% 1.0 0.1
Tennessee 7.8% 1.0 0.1
Southern Utah 6.7% 1.0 0.1
North Carolina St. 5.2% 1.0 0.1
Illinois 4.7% 2.0 0.1
Butler 1.4% 1.0 0.0
UCLA 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Louisville 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 20.3
Minimum 14.0
Maximum 26.0