Eastern Kentucky
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
10 |
Soufiane Bouchikhi |
SR |
31:06 |
71 |
Wade Meddles |
SR |
31:42 |
132 |
Ambrose Maritim |
FR |
31:59 |
178 |
Thijs Nijhuis |
JR |
32:10 |
194 |
Ole Hesselbjerg |
JR |
32:12 |
296 |
Ben Toroitich |
JR |
32:31 |
460 |
Erwin Leysen |
SR |
32:55 |
625 |
Sean Vandermosten |
JR |
33:15 |
843 |
Ben Turner |
SO |
33:37 |
880 |
Adams Ronnoh |
SR |
33:40 |
1,942 |
Kyle Burton |
SR |
35:13 |
2,223 |
Peter Migun |
JR |
35:46 |
2,814 |
Jerome Williams |
FR |
37:34 |
|
National Champion |
0.1% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
6.2% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
28.1% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
78.1% |
Regional Champion |
54.3% |
Top 5 in Regional |
99.8% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Soufiane Bouchikhi |
Wade Meddles |
Ambrose Maritim |
Thijs Nijhuis |
Ole Hesselbjerg |
Ben Toroitich |
Erwin Leysen |
Sean Vandermosten |
Ben Turner |
Adams Ronnoh |
Kyle Burton |
Virginia Panorama Farms Invitational |
09/28 |
589 |
31:09 |
32:11 |
31:55 |
32:25 |
32:23 |
|
32:45 |
33:08 |
33:26 |
33:51 |
35:02 |
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) |
10/05 |
1157 |
|
|
|
|
|
33:12 |
|
33:12 |
33:39 |
33:26 |
35:24 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/19 |
532 |
31:05 |
31:39 |
31:58 |
32:18 |
32:32 |
33:02 |
32:48 |
33:36 |
|
33:41 |
|
Ohio Valley Championship |
11/02 |
730 |
31:51 |
32:21 |
32:12 |
|
|
32:19 |
32:46 |
33:08 |
33:46 |
33:43 |
|
Southeast Region Championships |
11/15 |
301 |
30:50 |
31:04 |
31:48 |
31:41 |
31:54 |
31:51 |
33:10 |
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/23 |
458 |
31:08 |
31:36 |
32:06 |
32:10 |
31:55 |
33:05 |
33:23 |
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
99.4% |
14.9 |
401 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
5.2 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
5.4 |
5.8 |
4.9 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
5.0 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
2.9 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
Region Championship |
100% |
1.7 |
77 |
54.3 |
28.0 |
15.1 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Soufiane Bouchikhi |
99.9% |
14.9 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
5.0 |
4.6 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
3.9 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
Wade Meddles |
99.5% |
71.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
Ambrose Maritim |
99.4% |
111.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Thijs Nijhuis |
99.4% |
141.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ole Hesselbjerg |
99.4% |
143.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ben Toroitich |
99.4% |
187.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erwin Leysen |
99.4% |
221.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Soufiane Bouchikhi |
1.9 |
21.7 |
31.9 |
15.3 |
9.8 |
6.8 |
4.2 |
2.8 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
Wade Meddles |
8.4 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
2.8 |
6.8 |
9.4 |
9.5 |
9.7 |
8.3 |
7.2 |
5.5 |
4.9 |
4.3 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
Ambrose Maritim |
15.1 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
4.5 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
Thijs Nijhuis |
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
Ole Hesselbjerg |
21.7 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.0 |
Ben Toroitich |
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
Erwin Leysen |
53.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
54.3% |
100.0% |
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
1 |
2 |
28.0% |
100.0% |
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
2 |
3 |
15.1% |
100.0% |
| |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.6 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
15.1 |
3 |
4 |
2.0% |
99.0% |
| |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
1.9 |
4 |
5 |
0.5% |
20.8% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
0.1 |
5 |
6 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Total |
100% |
99.4% |
54.3 |
28.0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.6 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
82.3 |
17.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Texas |
99.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Indiana |
99.6% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
North Carolina |
96.8% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Notre Dame |
95.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Providence |
91.6% |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Air Force |
68.6% |
1.0 |
0.7 |
Harvard |
65.7% |
1.0 |
0.7 |
Virginia |
64.2% |
1.0 |
0.6 |
Florida |
59.3% |
1.0 |
0.6 |
Georgia |
55.0% |
1.0 |
0.6 |
Dartmouth |
23.0% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Georgetown |
17.7% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Minnesota |
17.1% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Auburn |
14.4% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Washington |
10.2% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Arizona State |
8.9% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Tennessee |
7.8% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
North Carolina St. |
5.2% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Illinois |
4.7% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Duke |
1.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
UCLA |
0.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Michigan State |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Louisville |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Missouri |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
9.1 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
4.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
14.0 |