Iona
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
55  Daniel Clorley SR 31:37
80  Kieran Clements FR 31:46
85  Matt Gillespie SR 31:47
117  Jake Byrne JR 31:56
180  Andrew Kowalsky JR 32:10
257  Ethan Heywood SO 32:25
288  Christopher Stogsdill SR 32:30
295  Mike O'Dowd SO 32:31
728  Chartt Miller FR 33:26
1,006  Quinn Raseman JR 33:51
1,071  Nickolaus Lachman JR 33:57
1,101  Andrew Tario FR 33:59
1,264  Daniel Galford FR 34:13
1,332  Andy Adamovics FR 34:18
1,355  Jimmy Tarsnane SR 34:19
1,854  Thomas McClellan FR 35:03
2,258  Ross Wightman FR 35:50
2,465  Brendan Farrell SR 36:17
3,032  Kolbe Jendzejec FR 39:05
3,293  Zoe Wojtech FR 51:55
National Rank #12 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #1 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 96.9%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Nationals


National Champion 0.4%
Top 5 at Nationals 9.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 35.3%
Top 20 at Nationals 79.5%


Regional Champion 34.7%
Top 5 in Regional 99.5%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Daniel Clorley Kieran Clements Matt Gillespie Jake Byrne Andrew Kowalsky Ethan Heywood Christopher Stogsdill Mike O'Dowd Chartt Miller Quinn Raseman Nickolaus Lachman
NYC Metro Championships 10/11
Princeton Invitational 10/19 1184 33:26 34:06 33:57
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 336 31:17 31:28 31:31 32:19 31:53 31:48 32:17
MAAC Championships 11/01 815 32:24 32:24 32:24 32:25 32:36 33:27 32:35 33:34
Northeast Region Championships 11/15 553 31:56 32:03 31:40 32:02 32:43 33:12 32:10
NCAA Championship 11/23 343 31:17 31:30 31:49 31:35 31:50 32:20 32:43





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 96.9% 13.7 384 0.4 1.0 1.8 2.8 3.9 4.5 5.1 5.0 5.2 5.5 4.9 5.0 5.1 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.7 3.8 3.3 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.3 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.0
Region Championship 100% 2.2 72 34.7 28.6 20.0 10.9 5.2 0.5 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniel Clorley 99.0% 60.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.9
Kieran Clements 97.8% 79.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2
Matt Gillespie 97.7% 82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3
Jake Byrne 97.3% 103.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Andrew Kowalsky 96.9% 141.0
Ethan Heywood 96.9% 173.6
Christopher Stogsdill 96.9% 183.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniel Clorley 6.5 1.3 7.8 13.0 10.3 8.1 6.6 6.1 4.8 4.9 4.3 3.5 3.6 3.3 2.4 2.2 2.3 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9
Kieran Clements 10.0 0.2 1.6 4.4 6.7 7.2 6.6 6.2 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.1 2.3 2.2 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.3
Matt Gillespie 10.5 0.1 1.3 3.2 5.9 6.5 6.9 6.9 5.6 5.9 5.7 4.3 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.4 2.9 2.6 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.2
Jake Byrne 14.6 0.1 0.9 1.4 2.5 3.5 4.3 4.1 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.2 4.7 5.0 4.4 4.8 4.1 3.5 3.6 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.1
Andrew Kowalsky 21.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.0 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.1 4.6 4.8 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.8 2.9
Ethan Heywood 29.7 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.2 1.0 1.4 2.4 2.4 3.1 3.6 3.6 4.0 4.1 3.7
Christopher Stogsdill 32.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.4 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 34.7% 100.0% 34.7 34.7 1
2 28.6% 100.0% 28.6 28.6 2
3 20.0% 96.5% 0.6 0.2 0.4 1.5 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.4 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.4 0.7 19.3 3
4 10.9% 88.8% 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.1 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.2 9.7 4
5 5.2% 80.2% 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 1.0 4.1 5
6 0.5% 76.0% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 96.9% 34.7 28.6 0.6 0.2 0.5 1.7 3.1 4.1 4.6 4.9 3.8 3.0 3.0 2.4 1.6 3.1 63.3 33.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Princeton 98.3% 1.0 1.0
Tulsa 95.9% 1.0 1.0
Stanford 78.1% 1.0 0.8
Florida State 67.8% 1.0 0.7
Southern Utah 6.7% 1.0 0.1
Oklahoma 4.4% 1.0 0.0
Boise State 3.3% 1.0 0.0
Butler 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Duke 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Virginia Tech 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Penn State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 3.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 8.0