Lamar
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
105 |
Matt Johnsen |
SR |
31:52 |
246 |
Ash Harrell |
SR |
32:22 |
334 |
Ryan Saunders |
JR |
32:38 |
564 |
Sam Stabler |
JR |
33:07 |
619 |
Michael Kershaw |
SR |
33:14 |
745 |
Ryan Creech |
JR |
33:28 |
873 |
Sean Guiney |
FR |
33:40 |
1,374 |
Matt Jackson |
JR |
34:21 |
2,286 |
Sean Chalmers |
FR |
35:54 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
99.8% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Matt Johnsen |
Ash Harrell |
Ryan Saunders |
Sam Stabler |
Michael Kershaw |
Ryan Creech |
Sean Guiney |
Matt Jackson |
Sean Chalmers |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/04 |
888 |
32:32 |
32:16 |
32:32 |
35:07 |
32:51 |
32:57 |
35:02 |
34:22 |
|
HBU Invitational |
10/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35:56 |
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) |
10/19 |
897 |
31:54 |
32:15 |
|
33:03 |
33:14 |
33:30 |
33:24 |
|
|
Southland Conference Championships |
11/01 |
910 |
32:05 |
32:23 |
|
32:42 |
33:42 |
33:13 |
33:22 |
|
35:55 |
South Central Region Championships |
11/15 |
789 |
31:33 |
32:03 |
32:47 |
32:51 |
33:14 |
35:07 |
|
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/23 |
|
31:41 |
33:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.2% |
28.8 |
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Region Championship |
100% |
3.1 |
106 |
|
0.2 |
92.0 |
7.0 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Matt Johnsen |
94.9% |
94.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Ash Harrell |
66.6% |
164.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Saunders |
31.4% |
191.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Stabler |
0.7% |
214.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Kershaw |
0.3% |
230.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Creech |
0.2% |
238.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Guiney |
0.2% |
240.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Matt Johnsen |
5.7 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
8.4 |
25.4 |
19.0 |
14.1 |
9.1 |
5.9 |
4.3 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Ash Harrell |
10.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.7 |
3.2 |
6.1 |
10.0 |
11.1 |
10.1 |
9.6 |
7.9 |
5.8 |
4.8 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
Ryan Saunders |
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
2.9 |
4.6 |
6.4 |
7.4 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
5.4 |
4.8 |
4.5 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
Sam Stabler |
31.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
4.2 |
Michael Kershaw |
35.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
Ryan Creech |
43.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
Sean Guiney |
51.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.2% |
100.0% |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
2 |
3 |
92.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
3 |
4 |
7.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.2% |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.8 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Butler |
1.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Lipscomb |
0.1% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Georgia Tech |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
2.0 |