Louisville
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
43 |
Tyler Byrne |
JR |
31:28 |
127 |
Ernest Kibet |
SO |
31:58 |
327 |
Mattias Wolter |
SR |
32:37 |
659 |
Japhet Kipkoech |
SO |
33:17 |
697 |
Stacey Eden |
SR |
33:21 |
1,107 |
Andrew Stewart |
JR |
34:00 |
1,281 |
Scott Anderson |
SR |
34:14 |
1,479 |
Jonathan Reynolds |
FR |
34:30 |
1,932 |
Dominic Perronie |
JR |
35:12 |
2,107 |
Thomas Cave |
FR |
35:30 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
12.2% |
Top 10 in Regional |
97.5% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Tyler Byrne |
Ernest Kibet |
Mattias Wolter |
Japhet Kipkoech |
Stacey Eden |
Andrew Stewart |
Scott Anderson |
Jonathan Reynolds |
Dominic Perronie |
Thomas Cave |
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) |
10/05 |
820 |
32:15 |
31:42 |
32:40 |
33:15 |
32:51 |
33:43 |
34:05 |
34:06 |
35:12 |
35:30 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/19 |
780 |
31:20 |
31:59 |
32:30 |
33:37 |
33:19 |
34:07 |
34:24 |
34:07 |
|
|
AAC Championships |
11/02 |
915 |
31:49 |
32:31 |
33:10 |
33:19 |
33:05 |
34:02 |
|
35:19 |
|
|
Southeast Region Championships |
11/15 |
710 |
31:25 |
31:32 |
32:24 |
32:58 |
36:02 |
34:12 |
|
34:56 |
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/23 |
|
31:10 |
32:19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.1% |
27.4 |
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Region Championship |
100% |
7.2 |
231 |
|
0.0 |
0.3 |
3.0 |
8.9 |
18.0 |
33.1 |
19.9 |
10.1 |
4.1 |
2.0 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Tyler Byrne |
93.1% |
53.5 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
Ernest Kibet |
11.4% |
96.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
Mattias Wolter |
0.1% |
160.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japhet Kipkoech |
0.1% |
203.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey Eden |
0.1% |
221.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Stewart |
0.1% |
244.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Anderson |
0.1% |
245.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Tyler Byrne |
5.1 |
1.8 |
6.8 |
12.7 |
14.3 |
13.6 |
11.0 |
7.6 |
5.9 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Ernest Kibet |
14.8 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
1.4 |
2.7 |
4.1 |
5.8 |
5.4 |
5.1 |
5.9 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
1.7 |
Mattias Wolter |
38.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
Japhet Kipkoech |
76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey Eden |
80.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Stewart |
123.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Anderson |
136.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
3 |
0.3% |
23.1% |
| |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
3 |
4 |
3.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
8.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
18.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
33.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
19.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
4.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
2.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.1% |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
99.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Minnesota |
17.1% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Tennessee |
7.8% |
2.0 |
0.2 |
Missouri |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Georgia Tech |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
3.0 |