Loyola Marymount
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
123 |
Weston Strum |
SR |
31:57 |
356 |
Kevin Joerger |
SR |
32:41 |
701 |
Drew Dalton |
SR |
33:22 |
828 |
John Pickhaver |
SR |
33:35 |
1,049 |
Michael Duncan |
SO |
33:54 |
1,267 |
Michael Vorgitch |
JR |
34:13 |
1,312 |
Daniel Gibson |
JR |
34:17 |
1,523 |
Douglas Petree |
JR |
34:34 |
1,996 |
Lance Capel |
SO |
35:19 |
2,191 |
Logan Fulton |
FR |
35:42 |
|
National Rank |
#76 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#12 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
15th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
1.7% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Weston Strum |
Kevin Joerger |
Drew Dalton |
John Pickhaver |
Michael Duncan |
Michael Vorgitch |
Daniel Gibson |
Douglas Petree |
Lance Capel |
Logan Fulton |
Stanford Invitational |
09/28 |
939 |
31:46 |
32:55 |
32:45 |
33:52 |
34:33 |
33:56 |
34:19 |
33:30 |
35:58 |
35:58 |
Chile Pepper Festival |
10/05 |
1004 |
32:03 |
32:47 |
33:37 |
33:32 |
|
34:27 |
33:39 |
35:10 |
|
|
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational |
10/19 |
1090 |
|
32:46 |
32:54 |
33:47 |
33:40 |
33:47 |
34:11 |
34:31 |
34:45 |
35:26 |
West Coast Conference Championships |
11/02 |
924 |
31:46 |
32:15 |
34:19 |
33:22 |
33:49 |
33:51 |
34:25 |
34:49 |
35:17 |
|
West Region Championships |
11/15 |
1013 |
32:16 |
32:41 |
33:25 |
33:25 |
33:45 |
36:01 |
34:52 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
13.7 |
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
6.0 |
12.0 |
19.6 |
26.4 |
31.5 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Weston Strum |
15.8% |
88.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Weston Strum |
20.2 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
2.9 |
2.4 |
Kevin Joerger |
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Drew Dalton |
86.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pickhaver |
96.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Duncan |
113.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Vorgitch |
129.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Gibson |
131.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
1.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
6.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
12.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
19.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
26.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
31.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |