Mississippi Valley
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,757  Daniel Kibet SR 34:55
2,120  Felix Kiprop SO 35:32
2,593  Jose Serrano JR 36:43
2,837  Romello Nalepa FR 37:40
3,104  Victor Chesang FR 39:49
3,164  Juan Perez SO 41:01
3,265  Theordore Johnson FR 44:49
3,292  Earl Winters JR 50:54
National Rank #278 of 311
South Region Rank #32 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Daniel Kibet Felix Kiprop Jose Serrano Romello Nalepa Victor Chesang Juan Perez Theordore Johnson Earl Winters
Rhodes Invitational 09/28 1448 36:09 35:34 36:39 36:43 38:30 40:59 45:39
Mississippi College/Watson Ford Invitational 10/04 1699 35:56 36:25 37:10 41:45 44:48
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1621 34:31 35:42 36:01 41:34 44:23
SWAC Championships 10/28 1515 35:39 35:46 37:01 37:39 41:22 40:47 50:56
South Region Championships 11/15 1543 34:18 34:57 37:30 40:46 40:46





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.7 931 0.0 0.1 1.0 3.8 9.2 20.9 41.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniel Kibet 130.3
Felix Kiprop 152.3
Jose Serrano 186.9
Romello Nalepa 211.9
Victor Chesang 243.4
Juan Perez 255.1
Theordore Johnson 269.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 1.0% 1.0 27
28 3.8% 3.8 28
29 9.2% 9.2 29
30 20.9% 20.9 30
31 41.7% 41.7 31
32 23.2% 23.2 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0