Oklahoma
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
62  Abbabiya Simbassa JR 31:39
153  Brandon Doughty SO 32:05
267  Patrick Gomez SR 32:26
315  Eric Graf FR 32:35
345  Dan Schubert SO 32:39
456  Kyle Polman FR 32:55
481  Jacob Burcham FR 32:58
622  Alex Deir JR 33:14
788  Dylan Blankenbaker FR 33:31
1,007  Daniel Aldaba FR 33:51
1,313  Will Hogston SO 34:17
1,439  Allen Eke SO 34:26
National Rank #34 of 311
Midwest Region Rank #4 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 14.7%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.1%
Top 20 at Nationals 2.7%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 76.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Abbabiya Simbassa Brandon Doughty Patrick Gomez Eric Graf Dan Schubert Kyle Polman Jacob Burcham Alex Deir Dylan Blankenbaker Daniel Aldaba Will Hogston
Roy Griak Invitational (Gold) 09/28 698 31:41 31:56 32:19 32:47 32:32 32:59 33:32 34:02 34:17
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 707 31:18 32:18 32:29 32:26 32:43 33:21 33:02
Big 12 Championships 11/02 706 31:41 31:47 32:38 32:38 32:44 32:42 33:11 32:57 33:42
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 780 31:58 32:26 32:21 32:31 32:42 32:43 34:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 14.7% 24.6 565 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.8 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.1 0.5
Region Championship 100% 4.7 147 0.0 2.7 12.1 35.6 25.6 14.9 6.2 2.3 0.4 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbabiya Simbassa 71.3% 70.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6
Brandon Doughty 19.2% 108.2
Patrick Gomez 14.7% 158.9
Eric Graf 14.7% 178.8
Dan Schubert 14.7% 191.9
Kyle Polman 14.7% 214.6
Jacob Burcham 14.7% 219.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbabiya Simbassa 7.0 1.3 4.0 6.7 8.6 10.1 9.3 9.7 6.8 5.4 4.7 3.7 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.6
Brandon Doughty 18.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.5 4.3 4.7 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.3 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.3
Patrick Gomez 32.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.9 2.4 2.9 3.2 3.0
Eric Graf 39.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.2
Dan Schubert 42.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.4
Kyle Polman 56.3 0.0 0.0 0.1
Jacob Burcham 58.9 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1
2 2.7% 100.0% 2.7 2.7 2
3 12.1% 45.9% 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.8 1.4 6.5 5.5 3
4 35.6% 14.7% 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.5 1.5 30.4 5.2 4
5 25.6% 4.1% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 24.5 1.1 5
6 14.9% 0.9% 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.8 0.1 6
7 6.2% 6.2 7
8 2.3% 2.3 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 14.7% 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.4 2.5 3.6 85.3 2.8 12.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida State 67.8% 1.0 0.7
Georgia 55.0% 1.0 0.6
Minnesota 17.1% 1.0 0.2
Southern Utah 6.7% 1.0 0.1
North Carolina St. 5.2% 1.0 0.1
Butler 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Duke 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Virginia Tech 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Penn State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0