Purdue
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
22  Matt McClintock SO 31:16
321  Caleb Kerr SO 32:36
531  Jake Waterman SR 33:03
538  Steven Stoot SR 33:05
615  Tate Schienbein SO 33:13
740  Tyler Wynn SO 33:27
784  Kevin Handshoe SO 33:31
996  Andrew Cartwright FR 33:50
1,335  Brett Klosterhoff SR 34:18
1,391  Rocky Pollack SO 34:22
2,244  Sam Hoffman SO 35:49
National Rank #56 of 311
Great Lakes Region Rank #7 of 30
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 3.0%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Matt McClintock Caleb Kerr Jake Waterman Steven Stoot Tate Schienbein Tyler Wynn Kevin Handshoe Andrew Cartwright Brett Klosterhoff Rocky Pollack Sam Hoffman
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/04 818 31:16 32:03 33:36 33:10 33:08 33:28 33:48 33:41 33:48
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 879 31:14 32:42 33:23 32:56 33:47 33:26 34:53
Big Ten Championships 11/03 795 31:23 32:48 32:30 33:09 32:33 33:34 34:17 34:55 35:50
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/15 851 31:08 32:44 32:50 33:05 33:27 33:27 33:53
NCAA Championship 11/23 31:16





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.5 630 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 7.5 218 0.0 0.2 2.7 12.5 34.6 36.7 11.8 1.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Matt McClintock 99.3% 25.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.5 2.8 2.3 2.7 2.6 2.5 3.0 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.0 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.1 1.7 2.1 1.7
Caleb Kerr 1.5% 183.0
Jake Waterman 0.1% 192.5
Steven Stoot 0.1% 215.0
Tate Schienbein 0.1% 219.5
Tyler Wynn 0.1% 222.0
Kevin Handshoe 0.1% 244.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Matt McClintock 2.4 29.0 16.7 11.4 7.9 6.3 4.6 4.0 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.2 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1
Caleb Kerr 36.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.6
Jake Waterman 55.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Steven Stoot 56.7 0.0 0.0
Tate Schienbein 62.8
Tyler Wynn 73.7
Kevin Handshoe 75.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.2% 30.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 4
5 2.7% 2.7 5
6 12.5% 12.5 6
7 34.6% 34.6 7
8 36.7% 36.7 8
9 11.8% 11.8 9
10 1.3% 1.3 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Butler 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Penn State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0