Rice
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
311 |
Will Firth |
SO |
32:34 |
612 |
John Cavallo |
SR |
33:13 |
690 |
Harry Sagel |
FR |
33:21 |
1,095 |
Adam Davidson |
FR |
33:59 |
1,350 |
Meron Fessahaie |
SO |
34:19 |
1,617 |
William Roberts |
SO |
34:43 |
1,661 |
Travis Roberts |
SR |
34:46 |
2,095 |
Aneesh Sampeth |
SO |
35:29 |
2,138 |
Tony Urbanelli |
SR |
35:34 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
7.9% |
Top 10 in Regional |
85.5% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Will Firth |
John Cavallo |
Harry Sagel |
Adam Davidson |
Meron Fessahaie |
William Roberts |
Travis Roberts |
Aneesh Sampeth |
Tony Urbanelli |
Rim Rock Farm Classic |
10/05 |
1165 |
33:24 |
33:28 |
33:23 |
34:11 |
34:42 |
34:38 |
34:21 |
35:34 |
35:11 |
Alabama Crimson Classic |
10/18 |
1122 |
32:56 |
32:58 |
33:26 |
34:09 |
34:49 |
|
34:40 |
35:04 |
|
Conference USA Championships |
11/02 |
1135 |
32:52 |
33:30 |
33:42 |
33:56 |
33:56 |
34:52 |
35:08 |
35:46 |
35:57 |
South Central Region Championships |
11/15 |
978 |
32:08 |
32:54 |
32:41 |
33:37 |
33:52 |
34:39 |
34:56 |
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/23 |
|
32:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
8.3 |
248 |
|
|
0.1 |
1.7 |
6.1 |
11.2 |
16.4 |
21.7 |
16.3 |
11.9 |
7.7 |
4.0 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Will Firth |
41.4% |
185.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Cavallo |
0.1% |
221.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Will Firth |
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.8 |
3.7 |
5.1 |
6.7 |
7.5 |
8.0 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
John Cavallo |
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
2.9 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
Harry Sagel |
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
Adam Davidson |
65.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meron Fessahaie |
83.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Roberts |
101.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travis Roberts |
104.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
3 |
4 |
1.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
6.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
11.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
16.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
21.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
16.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
11.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
7.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
4.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
1.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |