Seattle U.
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,402  Nathan McLaughlin SO 34:23
1,474  Graham Kinzel-Grubbs SR 34:29
1,877  Caleb Herrera SO 35:06
1,880  Gus Arroyo SO 35:06
2,122  Tyler Flannery FR 35:32
2,181  Jeff Baklund SR 35:40
2,202  Miles Hille JR 35:43
2,384  Ryan Dennison SR 36:06
2,793  Conner Hayes FR 37:28
National Rank #208 of 311
West Region Rank #27 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nathan McLaughlin Graham Kinzel-Grubbs Caleb Herrera Gus Arroyo Tyler Flannery Jeff Baklund Miles Hille Ryan Dennison Conner Hayes
Emerald City Open 10/19 1269 34:29 34:43 34:55 35:04 35:22 35:41 36:04 37:17
Beaver Classic 10/25 35:27 36:12 37:57
WAC Championships 11/02 1283 34:30 34:34 35:16 35:13 36:15 36:21 35:45
West Region Championships 11/15 1267 33:57 33:57 35:26 35:41 35:06 35:43 36:30





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 27.5 805 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 4.1 45.2 46.6 3.3 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nathan McLaughlin 137.6
Graham Kinzel-Grubbs 142.3
Caleb Herrera 169.8
Gus Arroyo 169.8
Tyler Flannery 184.0
Jeff Baklund 187.7
Miles Hille 188.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 0.0% 0.0 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 0.2% 0.2 24
25 0.6% 0.6 25
26 4.1% 4.1 26
27 45.2% 45.2 27
28 46.6% 46.6 28
29 3.3% 3.3 29
30 0.0% 0.0 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0