Tennessee
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
142  Peter Okwera SR 32:01
348  Daniel Tobin SR 32:40
504  Stephen Derlath SR 33:00
532  Austin Whitelaw SO 33:04
667  Kyle Walter SO 33:18
1,141  J.R. Creekmore JR 34:03
1,379  Jack Little FR 34:21
1,687  Jordan Chaney SR 34:48
1,689  Jeremy Dickie SO 34:48
2,825  Nick Kaiser SO 37:37
3,081  Breon Dixon SR 39:33
National Rank #66 of 311
South Region Rank #5 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 8.1%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 2.0%
Top 5 in Regional 85.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Peter Okwera Daniel Tobin Stephen Derlath Austin Whitelaw Kyle Walter J.R. Creekmore Jack Little Jordan Chaney Jeremy Dickie Nick Kaiser Breon Dixon
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/05 909 31:39 33:18 32:41 32:53 33:23 33:20 34:29 35:19 34:48 38:24 39:33
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/19 1001 32:31 32:30 33:02 33:14 33:49 34:24
SEC Championships 11/01 949 31:44 32:31 33:06 34:15 34:29 34:24 36:57
South Region Championships 11/15 925 31:54 32:40 33:14 32:41 34:57 34:11
NCAA Championship 11/23 32:46





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 8.1% 30.6 784 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.6 5.8
Region Championship 100% 4.4 143 2.0 5.8 11.6 26.3 39.3 11.2 2.9 0.5 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Peter Okwera 71.4% 113.0
Daniel Tobin 10.7% 181.5
Stephen Derlath 8.1% 214.2
Austin Whitelaw 8.1% 217.6
Kyle Walter 8.1% 231.0
J.R. Creekmore 8.3% 248.2
Jack Little 8.6% 250.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Peter Okwera 5.6 1.4 5.6 10.5 13.4 12.9 10.7 8.3 7.1 6.1 4.4 3.4 2.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2
Daniel Tobin 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.8 3.0 3.8 5.0 4.9 5.9 5.1 5.3 5.0 5.2 4.5 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.4 2.8 2.4 2.5
Stephen Derlath 29.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.7 3.2
Austin Whitelaw 31.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.7 2.6 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.3
Kyle Walter 42.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.3 1.4
J.R. Creekmore 84.7
Jack Little 103.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2.0% 100.0% 2.0 2.0 1
2 5.8% 100.0% 5.8 5.8 2
3 11.6% 2.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 11.3 0.3 3
4 26.3% 26.3 4
5 39.3% 39.3 5
6 11.2% 11.2 6
7 2.9% 2.9 7
8 0.5% 0.5 8
9 0.2% 0.2 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 8.1% 2.0 5.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 91.9 7.8 0.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Georgia Tech 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0