UCLA
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
133  Nick Hartle SO 31:59
226  Nohe Lema SR 32:17
249  Daniel Herrera JR 32:23
276  Sergey Sushchickh SO 32:28
285  Dustin Fay SR 32:29
362  Patrick Douglas SR 32:41
387  Ferdinand Edman FR 32:45
634  Zack Torres SR 33:15
710  Michael McCabe FR 33:23
825  Daniel De La Torre FR 33:35
945  Jacob Wood JR 33:46
1,021  Jonah Diaz FR 33:53
1,047  Nathaniel Cushing-Murray SO 33:54
1,056  Chase Zukerman JR 33:55
1,089  Austin O'Neil FR 33:59
National Rank #38 of 311
West Region Rank #6 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 4.7%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.1%
Top 20 at Nationals 1.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 47.9%
Top 10 in Regional 99.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nick Hartle Nohe Lema Daniel Herrera Sergey Sushchickh Dustin Fay Patrick Douglas Ferdinand Edman Zack Torres Michael McCabe Daniel De La Torre Jacob Wood
Sacremento State Inter-Regional Jamboree 10/04 768 32:23 32:20 31:57 32:40 32:31 33:19 32:56 33:44
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/19 794 31:47 32:29 32:29 32:46 32:40 33:16 33:45
Titan Invitational 10/25 1205
Pac-12 Championships 11/02 778 31:47 32:44 32:13 33:04 32:45 32:38 32:47 33:36 33:49
West Region Championships 11/15 740 32:08 31:56 32:32 32:17 32:46 33:04 33:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 4.7% 24.0 545 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
Region Championship 100% 5.9 188 0.0 0.4 3.4 20.2 23.9 18.8 13.8 9.5 6.4 2.7 0.7 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nick Hartle 14.9% 91.3 0.0 0.0
Nohe Lema 4.9% 133.0
Daniel Herrera 4.8% 149.2
Sergey Sushchickh 4.7% 161.2
Dustin Fay 4.8% 160.0
Patrick Douglas 4.7% 184.3
Ferdinand Edman 4.7% 192.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nick Hartle 21.5 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.6 3.0 4.0 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.4 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4
Nohe Lema 36.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0
Daniel Herrera 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.7 2.1
Sergey Sushchickh 44.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.0
Dustin Fay 45.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7
Patrick Douglas 55.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Ferdinand Edman 58.4 0.0 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1
2 0.4% 100.0% 0.4 0.4 2
3 3.4% 63.4% 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.3 2.2 3
4 20.2% 9.3% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 18.3 1.9 4
5 23.9% 0.8% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 23.7 0.2 5
6 18.8% 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.1 6
7 13.8% 13.8 7
8 9.5% 9.5 8
9 6.4% 6.4 9
10 2.7% 2.7 10
11 0.7% 0.7 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 4.7% 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 95.3 0.4 4.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Minnesota 17.1% 1.0 0.2
Tennessee 7.8% 1.0 0.1
Louisville 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0