Vanderbilt
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,289  John Ewing JR 34:15
1,716  Jake Van Geffen FR 34:50
1,867  Matthew Cleveland JR 35:05
2,016  Nick French SO 35:21
2,310  Andrew Fix SO 35:57
2,342  Andrew Bachman JR 36:01
2,364  Sam Reilly SO 36:04
2,368  David McAdams SR 36:05
2,779  Sam Andrews FR 37:23
3,102  Dan Henderson JR 39:48
National Rank #218 of 311
South Region Rank #22 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating John Ewing Jake Van Geffen Matthew Cleveland Nick French Andrew Fix Andrew Bachman Sam Reilly David McAdams Sam Andrews Dan Henderson
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/05 1307 34:27 34:56 35:32 35:50 35:45 36:27 36:42 37:38 39:48
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1307 34:45 35:42 35:18 35:30 35:18 36:01 35:58 36:17 37:13 39:49
SEC Championships 11/01 1273 33:53 34:38 34:53 35:18 37:56 35:57 36:22 36:06
South Region Championships 11/15 1253 34:05 34:29 34:49 34:56 35:51 35:25 35:52





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.0 673 0.0 0.3 4.3 91.1 3.5 0.7 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
John Ewing 96.8
Jake Van Geffen 127.0
Matthew Cleveland 137.1
Nick French 146.6
Andrew Fix 164.3
Andrew Bachman 166.4
Sam Reilly 167.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 0.3% 0.3 20
21 4.3% 4.3 21
22 91.1% 91.1 22
23 3.5% 3.5 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0