Cal Poly
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
294 |
Clayton Hutchins |
SO |
32:26 |
358 |
Luis Morales |
JR |
32:36 |
438 |
Dimitri Voytilla |
JR |
32:46 |
463 |
Tyler Huntley |
SR |
32:48 |
603 |
Riess Haslam |
JR |
33:02 |
730 |
Eric Sindel |
SO |
33:14 |
756 |
Nick Woolf |
JR |
33:16 |
775 |
Eric Hayen |
JR |
33:18 |
906 |
Zach Wims |
SO |
33:30 |
926 |
Albert Gamez |
JR |
33:32 |
1,100 |
Kyle Lynch |
SR |
33:48 |
1,353 |
Swarnjit Boyal |
FR |
34:06 |
|
National Rank |
#71 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#14 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
13th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.1% |
Top 10 in Regional |
23.4% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Clayton Hutchins |
Luis Morales |
Dimitri Voytilla |
Tyler Huntley |
Riess Haslam |
Eric Sindel |
Nick Woolf |
Eric Hayen |
Zach Wims |
Albert Gamez |
Kyle Lynch |
Stanford Invitational |
09/27 |
892 |
31:57 |
33:06 |
32:47 |
32:35 |
33:01 |
|
33:14 |
33:49 |
|
33:37 |
33:47 |
Bronco Invitational |
10/18 |
933 |
32:41 |
32:36 |
32:57 |
32:58 |
32:55 |
|
32:44 |
32:41 |
33:29 |
32:56 |
|
Big West Championships |
11/01 |
918 |
32:27 |
32:33 |
32:38 |
32:45 |
33:07 |
33:13 |
33:22 |
33:19 |
|
33:21 |
|
West Region Championships |
11/14 |
888 |
32:32 |
32:09 |
32:37 |
32:48 |
33:07 |
|
33:41 |
|
|
34:25 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
25.0 |
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
11.8 |
344 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
3.1 |
6.8 |
11.5 |
16.0 |
20.4 |
22.0 |
13.9 |
3.1 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Clayton Hutchins |
0.3% |
114.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Morales |
0.0% |
89.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimitri Voytilla |
0.0% |
141.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler Huntley |
0.0% |
201.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riess Haslam |
0.0% |
182.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Sindel |
0.0% |
196.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Woolf |
0.0% |
193.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Clayton Hutchins |
52.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
Luis Morales |
59.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Dimitri Voytilla |
68.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler Huntley |
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riess Haslam |
85.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Sindel |
98.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Woolf |
99.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.1% |
66.7% |
| |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
5 |
6 |
0.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
1.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
3.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
6.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
11.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
16.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
20.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
22.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
13.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
3.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |