Dartmouth
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
257  Silas Talbot SR 32:21
268  Curtis King JR 32:23
354  Nathaniel Adams SO 32:35
407  Brian Masterson JR 32:42
488  Tim Gorman JR 32:50
549  Matt Klein JR 32:56
623  Joey Chapin JR 33:03
845  Julian Heninger SO 33:25
894  Daniel Salas SO 33:29
911  Peter Geithner JR 33:31
1,039  Patrick Gregory FR 33:43
1,197  Dylan O'Sullivan SR 33:56
1,288  Anthony Anzvino JR 34:02
1,431  Connor Clark SO 34:13
1,567  Matt Herzig SO 34:24
2,226  John McAndrews FR 35:24
2,411  Will Shafer FR 35:46
2,629  Mike Maguire FR 36:16
National Rank #60 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #7 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.4%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 29.5%
Top 10 in Regional 99.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Silas Talbot Curtis King Nathaniel Adams Brian Masterson Tim Gorman Matt Klein Joey Chapin Julian Heninger Daniel Salas Peter Geithner Patrick Gregory
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/26 800 32:20 32:12 32:33 32:36 32:24 32:55 34:29 32:52 33:29
NEICAAA Championship 10/11 1113 33:08 33:05 33:26 33:28
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 750 31:59 32:15 32:08 32:16 34:59 33:28 34:04
Brown University - Rothenberg Meet 10/17 1250
Ivy League Heptagonal Championships 11/01 883 32:19 32:45 33:10 32:57 32:26 32:59 32:37 33:17 33:33 34:19
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 994 33:08 32:35 33:00 32:48 33:01 33:43 33:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.4% 26.8 652 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 6.5 192 0.0 0.5 11.4 17.5 19.2 22.4 19.6 7.7 1.3 0.3 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Silas Talbot 17.0% 158.9
Curtis King 13.5% 158.4
Nathaniel Adams 2.5% 176.0
Brian Masterson 0.9% 188.5
Tim Gorman 0.4% 196.0
Matt Klein 0.4% 193.5
Joey Chapin 0.4% 220.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Silas Talbot 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.5 2.3 2.4 3.0 3.1 3.8 3.8 4.1 4.4 3.9 4.2 3.5 3.7
Curtis King 27.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.7 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.3 3.4
Nathaniel Adams 37.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.4 2.2 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.8
Brian Masterson 43.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.7 1.8
Tim Gorman 51.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6
Matt Klein 59.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Joey Chapin 65.9 0.0 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 2
3 0.5% 70.8% 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 3
4 11.4% 0.2% 0.0 11.4 0.0 4
5 17.5% 17.5 5
6 19.2% 19.2 6
7 22.4% 22.4 7
8 19.6% 19.6 8
9 7.7% 7.7 9
10 1.3% 1.3 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.4% 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.6 0.0 0.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Lamar 13.6% 1.0 0.1
Illinois 7.6% 1.0 0.1
Cornell 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Yale 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 0.1% 3.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0