Gonzaga
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
184 |
Nick Roche |
SR |
32:07 |
298 |
Troy Fraley |
SO |
32:27 |
415 |
Kyle Branch |
JR |
32:43 |
508 |
Colin O'Neil |
SR |
32:52 |
651 |
Robert Walgren |
SR |
33:06 |
811 |
Danny Lunder |
SO |
33:21 |
859 |
Ian Goldizen |
SO |
33:27 |
879 |
Braeden Van Deynze |
JR |
33:28 |
1,131 |
Max Kaderabek |
FR |
33:51 |
1,996 |
Conor McCandless |
SO |
35:01 |
|
National Rank |
#65 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#13 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.1% |
Most Likely Finish |
12th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.1% |
Top 10 in Regional |
32.9% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Nick Roche |
Troy Fraley |
Kyle Branch |
Colin O'Neil |
Robert Walgren |
Danny Lunder |
Ian Goldizen |
Braeden Van Deynze |
Max Kaderabek |
Conor McCandless |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/03 |
859 |
32:01 |
32:28 |
32:37 |
32:50 |
32:55 |
33:22 |
|
33:28 |
|
|
West Coast Conference Championships |
11/01 |
921 |
32:12 |
32:43 |
32:44 |
33:06 |
33:06 |
32:58 |
33:44 |
|
33:50 |
35:00 |
West Region Championships |
11/14 |
829 |
32:06 |
32:06 |
32:47 |
32:36 |
33:20 |
33:46 |
33:05 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.1% |
26.3 |
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
11.3 |
329 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
2.5 |
5.6 |
10.1 |
13.8 |
18.3 |
20.3 |
16.4 |
9.4 |
2.2 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Nick Roche |
7.2% |
112.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troy Fraley |
0.1% |
128.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Branch |
0.1% |
171.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colin O'Neil |
0.1% |
205.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Walgren |
0.1% |
210.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danny Lunder |
0.1% |
221.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Goldizen |
0.1% |
241.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Nick Roche |
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
Troy Fraley |
51.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
Kyle Branch |
65.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colin O'Neil |
74.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Walgren |
89.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danny Lunder |
105.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Goldizen |
110.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.1% |
75.0% |
| |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
5 |
6 |
0.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
2.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
5.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
13.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
18.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
20.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
16.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
9.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Eastern Michigan |
1.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Iowa |
0.3% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Penn |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Bradley |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |