Harvard
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
202  Tom Purnell JR 32:10
285  Will Geiken SR 32:25
432  Nephat Maritim SR 32:45
433  Chris Allen JR 32:45
511  Ben Huffman FR 32:52
621  Dan Milechman SR 33:03
892  Lukas Gemar SR 33:29
982  Jack Stevenson SO 33:37
1,072  Louis Colson FR 33:44
1,143  Brandon Price SO 33:52
1,354  Tyler Spear FR 34:06
1,442  Evan Grandfield SO 34:14
1,490  Johnny Marvin JR 34:18
1,559  Fred Ward SR 34:24
1,581  Konrad Surkont JR 34:25
1,793  Carl Ward SR 34:42
1,846  Ryan Meehan SR 34:46
1,921  Gabe Montague FR 34:54
1,943  Connor Green FR 34:56
National Rank #61 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #8 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.3%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 20.0%
Top 10 in Regional 99.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tom Purnell Will Geiken Nephat Maritim Chris Allen Ben Huffman Dan Milechman Lukas Gemar Jack Stevenson Louis Colson Brandon Price Tyler Spear
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/26 843 32:02 32:23 32:20 33:03 33:04 33:29 33:29 33:01 34:07
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 1154 32:34
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 800 32:00 32:13 32:30 33:19 32:29 33:05 34:20
Princeton Invitational 10/18 1177 33:58 33:20 34:06
Ivy League Heptagonal Championships 11/01 922 32:15 32:51 33:28 32:45 32:41 33:09 33:26 33:24 34:01
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 842 32:04 32:20 32:44 32:40 33:27 32:51 34:15
NCAA Championship 11/22 32:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.3% 27.5 662 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 6.9 207 0.3 7.3 12.4 16.5 21.1 28.4 12.0 1.7 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tom Purnell 40.8% 136.3
Will Geiken 10.7% 165.2
Nephat Maritim 0.6% 185.0
Chris Allen 0.6% 181.3
Ben Huffman 0.3% 184.5
Dan Milechman 0.3% 218.0
Lukas Gemar 0.3% 243.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tom Purnell 19.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.9 2.4 3.1 3.6 3.4 5.0 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 4.5 4.6 3.8 3.6 3.1 2.9 2.4
Will Geiken 29.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.2 1.2 2.0 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.8 3.2 4.0 4.2 4.0 3.4
Nephat Maritim 46.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.2
Chris Allen 47.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.0
Ben Huffman 54.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Dan Milechman 64.6 0.0 0.0
Lukas Gemar 95.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.3% 82.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 3
4 7.3% 7.3 4
5 12.4% 12.4 5
6 16.5% 16.5 6
7 21.1% 21.1 7
8 28.4% 28.4 8
9 12.0% 12.0 9
10 1.7% 1.7 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 99.7 0.0 0.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Lamar 13.6% 1.0 0.1
Illinois 7.6% 1.0 0.1
Cornell 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0