Iona
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
48  Jake Byrne SR 31:32
64  Gilbert Kirui FR 31:40
69  Chartt Miller FR 31:42
102  Mike O'Dowd JR 31:51
148  Andrew Kowalsky SR 31:59
266  Kieran Clements SO 32:23
292  Otis Ubriaco JR 32:26
310  Brandon Allen FR 32:29
352  Quinn Raseman SR 32:35
401  Nickolaus Lachman SR 32:41
436  Xavier King SO 32:45
507  Johannes Motschmann FR 32:52
531  Andy Adamovics SO 32:55
560  Andrew Tario FR 32:57
1,393  Thomas McClellan SO 34:09
1,618  Ross Wightman SO 34:28
1,808  Daniel Galford FR 34:43
1,860  Kalen Sullivan FR 34:48
2,171  Alex Shodai FR 35:17
2,834  Gabriel Da Silva FR 36:55
2,951  Reed Kochanek SR 37:29
3,119  Rudy Torres-Martinez FR 38:41
3,195  Robert Kirsty FR 39:51
National Rank #10 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #2 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 99.8%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Nationals


National Champion 0.2%
Top 5 at Nationals 11.4%
Top 10 at Nationals 45.9%
Top 20 at Nationals 92.2%


Regional Champion 16.0%
Top 5 in Regional 100.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jake Byrne Gilbert Kirui Chartt Miller Mike O'Dowd Andrew Kowalsky Kieran Clements Otis Ubriaco Brandon Allen Quinn Raseman Nickolaus Lachman Xavier King
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/26 460 31:30 31:15 31:56 31:56 32:24 32:21 32:26
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 777 31:35 32:16 32:22
NYC Metro Championships 10/10
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 297 31:15 31:30 31:28 31:34 31:47 32:16 32:32
Wisconsin adidas Invitational - B 10/17 32:32 32:45
Princeton Invitational 10/18 1072 32:45
MAAC Championships 10/31 925 32:42 32:42 32:43 32:42 33:26 32:42 32:42 32:42 32:53 32:48 33:04
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 558 31:43 31:56 31:57 32:30 31:57 32:58 32:24
NCAA Championship 11/22 307 31:23 31:31 31:39 31:32 31:38 32:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 99.8% 11.8 357 0.2 0.9 1.9 3.2 5.3 6.1 6.6 6.8 7.3 7.6 6.9 6.7 6.9 5.6 4.5 4.2 3.6 2.9 2.5 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0
Region Championship 100% 2.1 57 16.0 59.3 23.1 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jake Byrne 100.0% 49.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.7 1.2
Gilbert Kirui 99.9% 69.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6
Chartt Miller 99.9% 73.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6
Mike O'Dowd 99.8% 97.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Andrew Kowalsky 99.8% 118.7 0.0
Kieran Clements 99.8% 179.0
Otis Ubriaco 99.8% 185.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jake Byrne 5.4 8.7 9.3 10.8 9.8 8.7 7.2 6.8 5.8 4.4 4.3 3.9 2.9 2.5 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3
Gilbert Kirui 7.9 2.1 4.1 6.1 7.1 7.3 8.8 8.1 7.3 6.6 5.4 4.8 4.4 3.9 3.2 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7
Chartt Miller 8.7 1.2 3.0 5.1 6.9 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.2 6.4 5.4 5.5 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.2 2.8 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7
Mike O'Dowd 11.7 0.1 0.5 1.2 2.7 4.1 5.1 5.3 6.2 7.0 6.8 6.6 6.1 5.1 5.2 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.3 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.3
Andrew Kowalsky 14.7 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.8 2.5 4.2 4.8 6.1 5.8 6.4 7.0 5.8 5.5 4.9 4.7 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 2.4 1.9 1.7
Kieran Clements 27.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.5 1.8 2.5 3.0 3.6 3.8 3.8 4.3 3.8 3.9 3.0 3.3
Otis Ubriaco 30.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.9 2.6 3.4 3.6 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 16.0% 100.0% 16.0 16.0 1
2 59.3% 100.0% 59.3 59.3 2
3 23.1% 100.0% 16.5 5.4 0.9 0.2 0.0 23.1 3
4 1.4% 100.0% 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 4
5 0.2% 22.2% 0.0 0.1 0.0 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 99.8% 16.0 59.3 16.5 6.3 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 75.3 24.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Stanford 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Portland 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Florida State 99.9% 1.0 1.0
Wisconsin 99.8% 1.0 1.0
Northern Arizona 99.8% 1.0 1.0
Michigan 99.3% 1.0 1.0
BYU 99.0% 1.0 1.0
Arkansas 98.4% 1.0 1.0
Providence 98.3% 1.0 1.0
UCLA 97.9% 1.0 1.0
Washington 96.4% 1.0 1.0
New Mexico 96.3% 1.0 1.0
Michigan State 90.5% 1.0 0.9
Indiana 83.4% 1.0 0.8
North Carolina 70.4% 1.0 0.7
Oklahoma 58.7% 1.0 0.6
Iowa State 42.0% 1.0 0.4
Minnesota 35.0% 1.0 0.4
Auburn 26.2% 1.0 0.3
Eastern Kentucky 22.6% 1.0 0.2
Princeton 14.7% 1.0 0.1
Lamar 13.6% 1.0 0.1
Illinois 7.6% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 16.5
Minimum 12.0
Maximum 22.0