Iowa
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
131 |
Kevin Lewis |
SR |
31:55 |
409 |
Ben Witt |
SR |
32:42 |
443 |
Anthony Gregorio |
SO |
32:46 |
450 |
Kevin Docherty |
SO |
32:47 |
518 |
Ben Anderson |
SO |
32:53 |
769 |
Nate Ferree |
SO |
33:17 |
872 |
Sam Fourman |
JR |
33:28 |
955 |
Taylor Soltys |
SO |
33:35 |
1,011 |
Michael Melchert |
FR |
33:40 |
1,113 |
Daniel Huff |
SO |
33:49 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
6.3% |
Top 10 in Regional |
86.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Kevin Lewis |
Ben Witt |
Anthony Gregorio |
Kevin Docherty |
Ben Anderson |
Nate Ferree |
Sam Fourman |
Taylor Soltys |
Michael Melchert |
Daniel Huff |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/03 |
879 |
31:57 |
33:08 |
32:50 |
32:57 |
32:30 |
33:25 |
|
32:59 |
33:47 |
34:37 |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue Race) |
10/18 |
870 |
|
32:43 |
32:33 |
32:53 |
32:19 |
32:24 |
|
34:16 |
|
33:40 |
Big Ten Conference Championship |
11/02 |
793 |
31:34 |
32:16 |
32:46 |
32:36 |
33:24 |
34:37 |
33:28 |
|
33:12 |
33:25 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/14 |
911 |
32:15 |
32:40 |
32:53 |
32:39 |
33:31 |
33:02 |
|
|
33:56 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.6% |
28.6 |
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Region Championship |
100% |
8.3 |
253 |
|
0.3 |
0.6 |
1.8 |
3.7 |
8.9 |
22.0 |
22.1 |
16.2 |
11.0 |
7.2 |
3.2 |
2.0 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Kevin Lewis |
27.0% |
94.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Ben Witt |
0.6% |
187.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony Gregorio |
0.6% |
177.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Docherty |
0.6% |
188.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ben Anderson |
0.6% |
208.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nate Ferree |
0.6% |
235.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Fourman |
0.6% |
238.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Kevin Lewis |
12.7 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.7 |
2.8 |
3.7 |
5.5 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
6.0 |
5.2 |
4.8 |
5.1 |
4.2 |
4.0 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
Ben Witt |
50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
Anthony Gregorio |
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
Kevin Docherty |
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
Ben Anderson |
65.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Nate Ferree |
90.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Fourman |
103.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.3% |
100.0% |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
2 |
3 |
0.6% |
27.6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
3 |
4 |
1.8% |
5.6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
1.7 |
|
0.1 |
4 |
5 |
3.7% |
1.1% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
3.7 |
|
0.0 |
5 |
6 |
8.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
22.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
22.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
16.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
11.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
7.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
3.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
2.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.6% |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
99.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Eastern Michigan |
1.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
North Texas |
0.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Texas-Arlington |
0.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Bradley |
0.0% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
2.0 |