Louisville
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
29 |
Edwin Kibichiy |
SO |
31:21 |
35 |
Ernest Kibet |
JR |
31:26 |
324 |
Japhet Kipkoech |
JR |
32:31 |
854 |
Jonathan Reynolds |
SO |
33:26 |
999 |
Daniel Southard |
FR |
33:39 |
1,041 |
Kyle Covert |
JR |
33:43 |
1,287 |
Chirs Striegel |
FR |
34:02 |
1,359 |
Andrew Stewart |
JR |
34:07 |
1,383 |
Nick Reader |
FR |
34:08 |
1,435 |
Matt Stephenson |
SO |
34:13 |
1,639 |
Thomas Cave |
SO |
34:30 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
1.4% |
Top 10 in Regional |
98.9% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Edwin Kibichiy |
Ernest Kibet |
Japhet Kipkoech |
Jonathan Reynolds |
Daniel Southard |
Kyle Covert |
Chirs Striegel |
Andrew Stewart |
Nick Reader |
Matt Stephenson |
Thomas Cave |
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) |
10/04 |
765 |
31:38 |
31:37 |
32:27 |
33:35 |
33:41 |
33:34 |
33:45 |
35:15 |
33:52 |
33:54 |
33:46 |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue Race) |
10/18 |
703 |
31:16 |
31:37 |
32:23 |
33:17 |
33:06 |
34:21 |
|
|
|
34:29 |
|
ACC Championships |
10/31 |
740 |
31:19 |
31:13 |
32:57 |
33:32 |
33:54 |
33:23 |
34:19 |
33:50 |
34:24 |
|
35:17 |
Southeast Region Championships |
11/14 |
731 |
31:29 |
31:32 |
32:23 |
33:19 |
33:52 |
|
34:01 |
33:48 |
|
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/22 |
|
31:04 |
31:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
21.0 |
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
7.5 |
238 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
10.3 |
42.7 |
31.2 |
10.8 |
2.5 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Edwin Kibichiy |
98.7% |
32.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
Ernest Kibet |
97.1% |
40.8 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
Japhet Kipkoech |
0.4% |
166.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Reynolds |
0.0% |
240.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Southard |
0.0% |
233.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Covert |
0.0% |
232.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chirs Striegel |
0.0% |
251.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Edwin Kibichiy |
2.2 |
24.7 |
22.4 |
13.4 |
9.3 |
5.8 |
4.6 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
Ernest Kibet |
2.9 |
13.9 |
21.1 |
16.1 |
10.3 |
7.5 |
5.1 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
Japhet Kipkoech |
34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
Jonathan Reynolds |
91.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Southard |
105.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Covert |
109.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chirs Striegel |
131.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
1.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
10.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
42.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
31.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
2.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
North Texas |
0.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Texas-Arlington |
0.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Iowa |
0.3% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Georgia Tech |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Bradley |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
2.0 |