Portland
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
17 |
Scott Fauble |
SR |
31:13 |
37 |
Reid Buchanan |
SR |
31:26 |
52 |
William Kincaid |
SR |
31:32 |
61 |
David Perry |
SR |
31:39 |
71 |
Timo Goehler |
SR |
31:42 |
104 |
Danny Martinez |
SO |
31:51 |
314 |
Jeff Thies |
FR |
32:30 |
333 |
Alex Dillard |
SO |
32:33 |
341 |
Alex Bowns |
SO |
32:34 |
382 |
Keegan Symmes |
FR |
32:39 |
410 |
Griffin Hay |
SO |
32:42 |
886 |
Justin Rocereto |
|
33:29 |
921 |
Sean O'Hollearn |
JR |
33:31 |
1,260 |
Chris Borg |
SR |
34:00 |
1,545 |
Will Baker-Robinson |
SO |
34:23 |
1,924 |
Ben Forsee |
SO |
34:54 |
2,225 |
Andy Holstrom |
SO |
35:24 |
3,224 |
Nick Shindler |
SO |
40:13 |
|
National Rank |
#4 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#3 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
100.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
3rd at Nationals |
National Champion |
2.8% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
57.7% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
89.8% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
99.5% |
Regional Champion |
17.8% |
Top 5 in Regional |
99.9% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Scott Fauble |
Reid Buchanan |
William Kincaid |
David Perry |
Timo Goehler |
Danny Martinez |
Jeff Thies |
Alex Dillard |
Alex Bowns |
Keegan Symmes |
Griffin Hay |
Washington Invitational |
10/04 |
859 |
|
|
|
|
32:19 |
|
32:20 |
|
|
32:21 |
32:33 |
Portland State Viking Classic |
10/04 |
1349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/17 |
361 |
31:08 |
31:25 |
31:25 |
31:51 |
32:12 |
32:20 |
|
32:42 |
|
|
|
Wisconsin adidas Invitational - B |
10/17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33:28 |
32:39 |
Beaver Classic |
10/24 |
1214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Conference Championships |
11/01 |
427 |
31:37 |
31:41 |
|
31:36 |
32:01 |
31:50 |
32:40 |
|
32:33 |
32:29 |
32:50 |
West Region Championships |
11/14 |
390 |
31:27 |
31:38 |
31:38 |
31:41 |
32:02 |
32:08 |
|
32:22 |
|
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/22 |
209 |
30:53 |
31:06 |
31:36 |
|
31:22 |
31:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
100.0% |
5.8 |
225 |
2.8 |
10.7 |
15.8 |
15.7 |
12.7 |
10.5 |
7.9 |
5.5 |
4.5 |
3.7 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Region Championship |
100% |
2.4 |
75 |
17.8 |
32.4 |
39.2 |
8.9 |
1.5 |
0.1 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Scott Fauble |
100.0% |
21.0 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
Reid Buchanan |
100% |
38.7 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
William Kincaid |
100.0% |
52.6 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
David Perry |
100.0% |
66.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
Timo Goehler |
100.0% |
74.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Danny Martinez |
100.0% |
98.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Jeff Thies |
100.0% |
193.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Scott Fauble |
5.8 |
4.2 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
10.2 |
10.4 |
8.0 |
6.7 |
5.9 |
4.7 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
Reid Buchanan |
10.2 |
0.5 |
1.9 |
3.4 |
5.2 |
6.2 |
7.2 |
6.6 |
6.9 |
5.7 |
5.4 |
4.8 |
4.4 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
William Kincaid |
13.4 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
3.7 |
4.8 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
5.5 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
2.9 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
David Perry |
17.6 |
0.0 |
|
0.2 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.9 |
2.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.5 |
4.1 |
4.9 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
Timo Goehler |
19.5 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
4.3 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
Danny Martinez |
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
Jeff Thies |
54.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
17.8% |
100.0% |
17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
1 |
2 |
32.4% |
100.0% |
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
2 |
3 |
39.2% |
100.0% |
| |
18.8 |
14.8 |
4.8 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
39.2 |
3 |
4 |
8.9% |
100.0% |
| |
|
3.8 |
3.4 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
4 |
5 |
1.5% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
5 |
6 |
0.1% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
100.0% |
17.8 |
32.4 |
18.8 |
18.6 |
8.8 |
2.6 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
50.2 |
49.8 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Stanford |
100.0% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Florida State |
99.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Northern Arizona |
99.8% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Michigan |
99.3% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
BYU |
99.0% |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Arkansas |
98.4% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Providence |
98.3% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
UCLA |
97.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Washington |
96.4% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
New Mexico |
96.3% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Michigan State |
90.5% |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Indiana |
83.4% |
1.0 |
0.8 |
North Carolina |
70.4% |
1.0 |
0.7 |
Oklahoma |
58.7% |
1.0 |
0.6 |
Iowa State |
42.0% |
1.0 |
0.4 |
Minnesota |
35.0% |
1.0 |
0.4 |
Eastern Kentucky |
22.6% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Princeton |
14.7% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Lamar |
13.6% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Illinois |
7.6% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Texas A&M |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Columbia |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Dartmouth |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
15.2 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
11.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
20.0 |