Tennessee
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
281  Austin Whitelaw SR 32:25
538  Kyle Walter JR 32:55
804  Jack Little JR 33:20
1,299  J.R. Creekmore SR 34:03
1,717  Jeremy Dickie SR 34:36
2,475  Nick Kaiser SR 35:55
3,148  Antonio Carter JR 39:04
National Rank #107 of 311
South Region Rank #6 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.0%
Top 10 in Regional 51.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Austin Whitelaw Kyle Walter Jack Little J.R. Creekmore Jeremy Dickie Nick Kaiser Antonio Carter
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/04 1130 33:06 33:06 33:35 33:46 34:15 36:15 39:02
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1102 32:28 33:02 33:17 35:02 34:35 36:10
SEC Championships 10/31 1031 32:15 32:45 33:05 33:56 34:55 35:49
South Region Championships 11/14 1024 32:00 32:50 33:25 33:56 34:40 35:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 10.4 300 0.2 1.8 4.0 7.8 10.0 12.6 15.5 14.3 12.9 9.7 6.7 3.3 1.0 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Austin Whitelaw 34.3% 173.4
Kyle Walter 0.6% 202.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Austin Whitelaw 11.5 0.0 0.3 0.8 1.7 2.9 4.9 6.3 7.6 8.5 7.3 7.1 5.6 5.7 4.6 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.2
Kyle Walter 27.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.6 1.5 2.6 2.5 2.7 3.2 3.2 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.4 3.5
Jack Little 45.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1
J.R. Creekmore 85.8
Jeremy Dickie 115.1
Nick Kaiser 157.3
Antonio Carter 232.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.2% 0.2 4
5 1.8% 1.8 5
6 4.0% 4.0 6
7 7.8% 7.8 7
8 10.0% 10.0 8
9 12.6% 12.6 9
10 15.5% 15.5 10
11 14.3% 14.3 11
12 12.9% 12.9 12
13 9.7% 9.7 13
14 6.7% 6.7 14
15 3.3% 3.3 15
16 1.0% 1.0 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas A&M 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0