Texas A&M
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
357  Isaac Spencer SR 32:35
481  Ryan Miller SR 32:49
523  Austin Wells SO 32:54
839  Cameron Villarreal SO 33:24
939  Austin Geerts SR 33:33
995  Ryan Teel SO 33:38
1,052  Christian Farris FR 33:43
1,574  Elliott Farris SO 34:24
1,584  Colin Slattery SR 34:25
1,651  Colin Stoeber SO 34:30
2,718  Julian Castellano FR 36:34
National Rank #91 of 311
South Central Region Rank #6 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.2%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 38.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Isaac Spencer Ryan Miller Austin Wells Cameron Villarreal Austin Geerts Ryan Teel Christian Farris Elliott Farris Colin Slattery Colin Stoeber Julian Castellano
Roy Griak Invitational 09/27 931 31:57 32:56 32:23 33:50 34:03 34:10 33:29 33:58 34:25 36:05
HBU Invitational 10/10 1272 33:46 34:06 34:21 37:32
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 1057 32:37 32:52 33:16 33:26 33:28 34:28 35:28
Wisconsin adidas Invitational - B 10/17 33:20 33:39 34:36
SEC Championships 10/31 1109 33:20 32:56 33:26 33:24 33:28 33:42 33:46 35:21 34:14
South Region Championships 11/14 983 32:34 32:34 32:35 33:24 33:34 33:43 33:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.2% 30.7 853 0.0 0.0 0.2
Region Championship 100% 5.8 177 0.2 2.3 13.4 23.0 31.9 20.6 6.6 1.7 0.4 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Isaac Spencer 12.7% 185.1
Ryan Miller 1.5% 209.8
Austin Wells 0.7% 208.3
Cameron Villarreal 0.2% 234.0
Austin Geerts 0.2% 238.0
Ryan Teel 0.2% 239.0
Christian Farris 0.2% 247.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Isaac Spencer 17.3 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.7 2.2 3.2 4.0 4.5 4.3 4.9 4.7 5.3 4.6 4.4 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.0 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.1 2.6
Ryan Miller 25.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.3 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.5 4.4 4.0 3.9 3.7
Austin Wells 27.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.6 2.3 2.4 3.2 3.3 2.9 3.6 3.9 4.1 3.6 3.9
Cameron Villarreal 48.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
Austin Geerts 54.8 0.0 0.0
Ryan Teel 59.2
Christian Farris 63.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.2% 100.0% 0.2 0.2 2
3 2.3% 0.9% 0.0 2.3 0.0 3
4 13.4% 13.4 4
5 23.0% 23.0 5
6 31.9% 31.9 6
7 20.6% 20.6 7
8 6.6% 6.6 8
9 1.7% 1.7 9
10 0.4% 0.4 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.2% 0.2 0.0 99.8 0.2 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas-Arlington 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0