Virginia Tech
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
160  Stuart Robertson SO 32:01
289  Darren Barlow JR 32:26
306  Patrick Joseph SO 32:29
383  Neil Gourley SO 32:39
421  Andrew Gaiser FR 32:44
516  Daniel Jaskowak FR 32:53
703  Juan Campos JR 33:11
728  George Carter JR 33:13
1,087  Daniel Rau FR 33:46
1,201  Ashkan Mohammadi FR 33:56
1,271  Brent Musselman FR 34:01
2,202  Biruk Ergetie FR 35:21
National Rank #51 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #7 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 2.8%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.2%


Regional Champion 0.3%
Top 5 in Regional 33.5%
Top 10 in Regional 99.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Stuart Robertson Darren Barlow Patrick Joseph Neil Gourley Andrew Gaiser Daniel Jaskowak Juan Campos George Carter Daniel Rau Ashkan Mohammadi Brent Musselman
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/04 910 32:16 32:52 32:27 32:45 33:21 34:07 33:10 33:47 33:41
Princeton Invitational 10/18 808 31:52 32:16 32:33 32:52 32:48 32:51 33:13 33:45 34:17
ACC Championships 10/31 823 32:04 32:21 32:39 32:41 32:48 32:40 32:42 33:16 33:45 34:10
Southeast Region Championships 11/14 735 31:54 32:19 32:13 32:32 32:32 32:47 33:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 2.8% 26.1 631 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.1
Region Championship 100% 5.7 171 0.3 0.9 3.6 8.7 20.0 47.1 12.9 4.9 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Stuart Robertson 19.5% 112.4 0.0
Darren Barlow 3.2% 150.8
Patrick Joseph 3.2% 159.5
Neil Gourley 2.9% 179.9
Andrew Gaiser 2.8% 186.8
Daniel Jaskowak 2.8% 212.9
Juan Campos 2.8% 231.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Stuart Robertson 15.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 1.8 2.7 3.3 4.1 4.2 5.0 4.8 5.1 4.3 4.3 4.8 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.2 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.0 2.0
Darren Barlow 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.8 2.1 2.8 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.2
Patrick Joseph 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9
Neil Gourley 40.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.0
Andrew Gaiser 45.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1
Daniel Jaskowak 53.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2
Juan Campos 73.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 1
2 0.9% 100.0% 0.9 0.9 2
3 3.6% 34.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 2.4 1.2 3
4 8.7% 3.9% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 8.3 0.3 4
5 20.0% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 5
6 47.1% 47.1 6
7 12.9% 12.9 7
8 4.9% 4.9 8
9 1.2% 1.2 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 2.8% 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 97.2 1.2 1.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mid. Tenn. State 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Penn 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0