Washington St.
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
200 |
Drew Jordan |
SR |
32:09 |
267 |
John Whelan |
SO |
32:23 |
399 |
Sam Levora |
FR |
32:41 |
465 |
Richard Shroy |
SR |
32:48 |
542 |
Jackson Haselnus |
SO |
32:56 |
550 |
Lee George |
SR |
32:56 |
561 |
Forrest Shaffer |
JR |
32:57 |
803 |
Conner Johnsen |
SO |
33:20 |
1,151 |
Michael Williams |
FR |
33:53 |
1,687 |
Peter Helman |
FR |
34:33 |
|
National Rank |
#58 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#11 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.2% |
Most Likely Finish |
10th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.4% |
Top 10 in Regional |
60.5% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Drew Jordan |
John Whelan |
Sam Levora |
Richard Shroy |
Jackson Haselnus |
Lee George |
Forrest Shaffer |
Conner Johnsen |
Michael Williams |
Peter Helman |
Stanford Invitational |
09/27 |
806 |
31:56 |
32:20 |
32:32 |
32:48 |
|
32:40 |
32:58 |
|
33:52 |
34:33 |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue Race) |
10/18 |
828 |
32:11 |
32:14 |
32:33 |
|
32:45 |
32:49 |
33:24 |
33:23 |
|
|
Pac-12 Championships |
10/31 |
881 |
32:13 |
32:35 |
32:32 |
|
33:01 |
32:50 |
32:52 |
33:21 |
|
|
West Region Championships |
11/14 |
902 |
32:15 |
32:23 |
33:27 |
|
32:59 |
33:45 |
32:35 |
33:15 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.2% |
24.3 |
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
10.0 |
297 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.4 |
2.7 |
6.8 |
11.6 |
17.9 |
21.1 |
16.8 |
12.2 |
7.0 |
2.7 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Drew Jordan |
4.3% |
113.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Whelan |
0.4% |
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Levora |
0.2% |
167.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Shroy |
0.2% |
187.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Haselnus |
0.2% |
208.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lee George |
0.2% |
200.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forrest Shaffer |
0.2% |
182.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Drew Jordan |
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
John Whelan |
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
Sam Levora |
63.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Richard Shroy |
70.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Haselnus |
79.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lee George |
79.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forrest Shaffer |
80.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
4 |
5 |
0.4% |
55.6% |
| |
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
5 |
6 |
2.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
6.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
11.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
17.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
21.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
16.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
12.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
7.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.8 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
North Texas |
0.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Texas-Arlington |
0.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Iowa |
0.3% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Bradley |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |