Austin Peay
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,357  Wesley Gray FR 34:18
1,640  Daniel Hamm JR 34:44
1,804  Martin Rejman SO 35:00
2,386  Fernando Lincoln FR 36:17
2,536  Elijah Wilson SO 36:45
2,595  Hunter Guthrie JR 36:59
2,707  Marshall McReynolds FR 37:35
2,728  Nick Piskor SO 37:44
National Rank #239 of 308
South Region Rank #21 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 13.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Wesley Gray Daniel Hamm Martin Rejman Fernando Lincoln Elijah Wilson Hunter Guthrie Marshall McReynolds Nick Piskor
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/03 1291 34:26 34:45 34:01 36:48 36:59 36:57
Cross Country Only National Invitational 10/17 1317 34:17 34:48 35:28 35:54 36:30 37:10 38:03 37:43
Ohio Valley Championships 10/31 1328 34:29 35:04 34:55 36:13 36:50 37:39
South Region Championships 11/13 34:01 34:26 35:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.5 699 0.1 1.0 12.6 49.9 18.5 8.8 5.6 2.3 1.0 0.3 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Wesley Gray 96.9
Daniel Hamm 115.1
Martin Rejman 124.8
Fernando Lincoln 170.1
Elijah Wilson 185.7
Hunter Guthrie 192.3
Marshall McReynolds 207.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 1.0% 1.0 19
20 12.6% 12.6 20
21 49.9% 49.9 21
22 18.5% 18.5 22
23 8.8% 8.8 23
24 5.6% 5.6 24
25 2.3% 2.3 25
26 1.0% 1.0 26
27 0.3% 0.3 27
28 0.0% 0.0 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0