Baylor
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
437  Eric Anderson SO 32:51
698  J R Hardy SR 33:20
897  Matt League JR 33:38
1,009  Kyle Scanlan SR 33:48
1,187  Matt Parham SO 34:04
1,379  Seth Brown FR 34:19
1,470  Matt Galvin SR 34:28
1,617  Chris McElroy SR 34:42
1,771  Henry Huff FR 34:56
1,946  Sean McCullough SR 35:15
National Rank #123 of 308
South Central Region Rank #10 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.2%
Top 10 in Regional 91.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Eric Anderson J R Hardy Matt League Kyle Scanlan Matt Parham Seth Brown Matt Galvin Chris McElroy Henry Huff Sean McCullough
Stanford Invitational 09/26 1123 32:48 33:57 33:33 33:52 34:03 34:20 35:08 34:51 34:49
Chile Pepper Festival 10/02 1121 32:41 33:22 33:48 34:03 35:15 34:18 34:33 34:46 35:06
Big 12 Championships 10/31 1138 32:54 33:23 34:04 33:51 33:53 34:09 34:27 34:47 35:24 35:31
South Central Regional Championships 11/13 1093 33:18 32:48 33:12 33:24 33:43 34:48 34:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 8.4 278 0.0 0.2 2.9 25.2 30.6 19.7 13.4 6.4 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Eric Anderson 0.9% 176.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Eric Anderson 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.7 2.2 2.8 3.0 3.6 4.2 4.3 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.5
J R Hardy 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4
Matt League 57.1
Kyle Scanlan 64.6
Matt Parham 77.1
Seth Brown 90.8
Matt Galvin 98.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 0.2% 0.2 5
6 2.9% 2.9 6
7 25.2% 25.2 7
8 30.6% 30.6 8
9 19.7% 19.7 9
10 13.4% 13.4 10
11 6.4% 6.4 11
12 1.3% 1.3 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0