Binghamton
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
408  Collin Frost SR 32:48
578  Ethan Hausamann SR 33:07
798  Eric Holt JR 33:29
1,011  Andrew Roache SR 33:48
1,112  Nathaniel Kozyra JR 33:56
1,162  Jonathan Vallecorsa SR 34:01
2,048  Nathaniel Howe FR 35:26
2,050  Thomas Moshier FR 35:26
2,066  Jared Rousell SR 35:28
2,383  Jade Marhaba SR 36:16
2,420  Adam McIe JR 36:21
2,491  Andrew Sweeney JR 36:35
2,493  Pat Watters FR 36:35
2,560  Daniel Hausamann FR 36:52
National Rank #109 of 308
Northeast Region Rank #10 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 27.6%
Top 20 in Regional 97.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Collin Frost Ethan Hausamann Eric Holt Andrew Roache Nathaniel Kozyra Jonathan Vallecorsa Nathaniel Howe Thomas Moshier Jared Rousell Jade Marhaba Adam McIe
Paul Short Invitational 10/02 1096 32:46 33:07 33:25 33:45 33:44 33:42 34:18 35:29
Ualbany Invite 10/17 1368 34:50 35:28 36:16
America East Championships 10/31 1109 32:44 33:12 33:43 33:48 34:15 33:58 36:09 35:36 37:21
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 1113 32:58 33:05 33:23 33:52 33:55 34:31 36:10





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 12.8 427 0.6 10.8 16.2 14.4 12.9 9.8 8.9 6.9 5.2 4.4 3.3 2.6 2.0 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Collin Frost 0.5% 182.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Collin Frost 43.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.3
Ethan Hausamann 60.2 0.0
Eric Holt 82.8
Andrew Roache 110.8
Nathaniel Kozyra 123.4
Jonathan Vallecorsa 129.4
Nathaniel Howe 228.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.6% 0.6 8
9 10.8% 10.8 9
10 16.2% 16.2 10
11 14.4% 14.4 11
12 12.9% 12.9 12
13 9.8% 9.8 13
14 8.9% 8.9 14
15 6.9% 6.9 15
16 5.2% 5.2 16
17 4.4% 4.4 17
18 3.3% 3.3 18
19 2.6% 2.6 19
20 2.0% 2.0 20
21 1.2% 1.2 21
22 0.6% 0.6 22
23 0.3% 0.3 23
24 0.0% 0.0 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0