Bradley
Men -
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
189 |
Michael Ward |
SO |
32:13 |
334 |
Patrick Campbell |
JR |
32:38 |
392 |
Taylor FloydMews |
SO |
32:47 |
549 |
Caleb Beck |
JR |
33:04 |
846 |
Marshall Moyer |
SR |
33:34 |
980 |
Haran Dunderdale |
SO |
33:45 |
1,137 |
Daniel Gagne |
JR |
33:59 |
1,426 |
Steffen Uhrich |
JR |
34:24 |
1,439 |
Michael Bianchina |
JR |
34:24 |
1,578 |
William Anderson |
FR |
34:38 |
1,764 |
Cole Dill |
SR |
34:55 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.7% |
Top 10 in Regional |
71.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Michael Ward |
Patrick Campbell |
Taylor FloydMews |
Caleb Beck |
Marshall Moyer |
Haran Dunderdale |
Daniel Gagne |
Steffen Uhrich |
Michael Bianchina |
William Anderson |
Cole Dill |
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/02 |
957 |
32:08 |
32:45 |
33:38 |
32:46 |
33:16 |
|
33:36 |
34:28 |
34:38 |
|
|
Bradley 'Pink' Classic Invitational (Red) |
10/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33:53 |
|
34:32 |
|
34:18 |
35:01 |
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) |
10/17 |
934 |
32:16 |
32:45 |
32:47 |
32:58 |
33:02 |
|
33:54 |
|
33:43 |
|
|
Illini Open |
10/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34:08 |
|
35:09 |
34:51 |
Missouri Valley Championships |
10/31 |
910 |
32:11 |
32:28 |
32:20 |
33:19 |
33:57 |
33:36 |
34:17 |
|
34:46 |
|
|
Midwest Region Championships |
11/13 |
957 |
32:16 |
32:33 |
32:37 |
33:25 |
34:23 |
33:45 |
34:17 |
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
9.5 |
286 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
4.2 |
11.0 |
16.5 |
20.2 |
18.4 |
13.2 |
8.0 |
4.5 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Michael Ward |
4.4% |
118.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taylor FloydMews |
0.0% |
201.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Michael Ward |
21.6 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.9 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
Patrick Campbell |
39.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
Taylor FloydMews |
47.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
Caleb Beck |
64.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Marshall Moyer |
99.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haran Dunderdale |
115.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Gagne |
130.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
3 |
4 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
4.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
11.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
16.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
20.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
18.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
13.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
8.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
4.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.