Cincinnati
Men -
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
306 |
Toby Loveridge |
SO |
32:34 |
972 |
Dan Huben |
SO |
33:44 |
1,076 |
Seamus Collins |
SO |
33:53 |
1,188 |
Greg Sanders |
SR |
34:04 |
1,208 |
Spencer Clark |
SO |
34:05 |
1,221 |
Anthony Car |
JR |
34:06 |
1,305 |
Jacob Franklin |
SR |
34:14 |
1,618 |
Ian Silver |
SR |
34:42 |
1,759 |
Nick Grismer |
FR |
34:55 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.1% |
Top 20 in Regional |
97.3% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Toby Loveridge |
Dan Huben |
Seamus Collins |
Greg Sanders |
Spencer Clark |
Anthony Car |
Jacob Franklin |
Ian Silver |
Nick Grismer |
All Ohio Championships |
10/02 |
1179 |
|
33:37 |
33:45 |
34:28 |
33:46 |
|
34:08 |
35:05 |
34:18 |
D1 Pre-Nationals (Black) |
10/17 |
1123 |
32:27 |
33:46 |
|
|
34:17 |
34:04 |
34:30 |
|
35:08 |
American Athletic Conference Championship |
10/31 |
1134 |
32:42 |
33:38 |
34:12 |
33:54 |
34:12 |
34:10 |
34:25 |
34:34 |
35:11 |
Great Lakes Region Championships |
11/13 |
1194 |
|
34:04 |
33:49 |
33:53 |
|
|
33:57 |
34:30 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
17.5 |
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
2.1 |
3.9 |
8.8 |
12.2 |
16.9 |
22.3 |
22.1 |
8.0 |
2.1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Toby Loveridge |
0.1% |
184.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Toby Loveridge |
38.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
Dan Huben |
99.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seamus Collins |
110.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Sanders |
122.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer Clark |
123.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony Car |
124.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob Franklin |
133.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
2.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
8.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
12.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
16.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
22.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
22.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
8.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |