Dartmouth
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
178  Brian Masterson SR 32:11
228  Joey Chapin SR 32:22
249  Daniel Salas JR 32:25
301  Curtis King SR 32:33
316  Peter Geithner SR 32:35
413  Nathaniel Adams JR 32:48
430  Julian Heninger JR 32:49
693  Marco Pompilj FR 33:20
926  Alexander Kushen FR 33:40
1,261  Miles Irish SO 34:09
1,392  Will Shafer SO 34:20
1,607  Dominic Carrese FR 34:41
1,872  Benjamin Szuhaj FR 35:08
1,887  Anthony Anzvino SR 35:10
1,947  Michael Schlichting SO 35:15
2,184  Reed Horton FR 35:45
2,284  Everest Crawford FR 36:00
National Rank #50 of 308
Northeast Region Rank #7 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 9.7%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 1.3%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 57.6%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Brian Masterson Joey Chapin Daniel Salas Curtis King Peter Geithner Nathaniel Adams Julian Heninger Marco Pompilj Alexander Kushen Miles Irish Will Shafer
Coast to Coast Battle in Beantown 09/25 688 32:09 32:18 32:24 32:01 32:14 32:21 32:50 33:37
NEICAAA Championship 10/10 1166 33:19 33:49 33:59
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 799 32:19 32:19 32:30 32:18 32:38 33:02 32:51
Brown - Rothenberg Meet 10/16 1211 33:36 34:18 34:19
Ivy League Championships 10/30 725 31:30 32:18 32:38 34:27 32:58 32:38 32:26 33:22 33:43 34:53
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 856 32:47 32:39 32:10 32:35 32:34 33:09 33:14





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 9.7% 25.7 603 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.6
Region Championship 100% 5.2 142 0.9 13.1 21.0 22.6 22.4 17.3 2.7 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brian Masterson 34.3% 133.5
Joey Chapin 17.6% 149.8
Daniel Salas 14.6% 159.6
Curtis King 10.6% 167.2
Peter Geithner 10.3% 176.6
Nathaniel Adams 9.7% 195.7
Julian Heninger 9.7% 202.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brian Masterson 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 1.1 1.6 2.4 2.6 4.0 3.6 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.3 4.8 4.9 4.5 4.4 3.6 3.5 3.1 3.2
Joey Chapin 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.8 3.7 3.8 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.5 4.8 4.8 3.6 4.2
Daniel Salas 26.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.2 2.6 2.7 3.5 3.8 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.1 4.2 4.0
Curtis King 31.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.5 3.4 3.1 3.4 3.6
Peter Geithner 33.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.5 3.8
Nathaniel Adams 43.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.9
Julian Heninger 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.9% 100.0% 0.9 0.9 2
3 13.1% 49.6% 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 6.6 6.5 3
4 21.0% 9.8% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 19.0 2.1 4
5 22.6% 0.7% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 22.4 0.2 5
6 22.4% 0.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 0.1 6
7 17.3% 17.3 7
8 2.7% 2.7 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 9.7% 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.1 90.3 0.9 8.8




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida State 91.5% 1.0 0.9
Princeton 19.2% 1.0 0.2
Lamar 9.0% 1.0 0.1
Notre Dame 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Georgia 6.3% 1.0 0.1
Penn State 3.3% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 2.1% 1.0 0.0
Iowa State 0.8% 1.0 0.0
South Dakota St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 5.0