Indiana
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
93  Rorey Hunter SR 31:48
123  Jason Crist JR 31:57
210  Kyle DuVall SO 32:18
235  Owen Skeete SR 32:23
370  Carl Smith JR 32:44
452  Mark Chandler JR 32:53
655  Jeremy Coughler SO 33:15
747  Joshua Roche SR 33:25
842  Kyle Burks FR 33:33
959  Eric Claxton SO 33:43
1,402  Jordan Huntoon SO 34:21
1,461  Robert Browning FR 34:27
1,467  Connor Martin SR 34:27
National Rank #35 of 308
Great Lakes Region Rank #4 of 31
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 65.3%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.7%
Top 20 at Nationals 15.8%


Regional Champion 2.3%
Top 5 in Regional 81.8%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Rorey Hunter Jason Crist Kyle DuVall Owen Skeete Carl Smith Mark Chandler Jeremy Coughler Joshua Roche Kyle Burks Eric Claxton Jordan Huntoon
Princeton Inter Regional 10/03 761 32:17 32:20 32:13 32:25 33:11 32:27 32:27 33:01 33:30 33:37 34:13
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 685 31:45 31:55 32:10 32:27 32:58 34:12
D1 Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/17 1114 32:56 33:14 33:40 33:10 34:29
Big Ten Championships 11/01 572 31:14 31:28 33:01 31:56 32:29 33:09 34:34 33:17 34:55
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/13 726 32:02 32:06 32:12 32:43 32:26 32:59 33:51





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 65.3% 23.7 557 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.1 4.3 4.1 4.5 5.3 6.3 5.5 5.8 5.3 3.5 1.8
Region Championship 100% 4.0 133 2.3 15.8 23.3 22.2 18.3 11.0 5.3 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rorey Hunter 70.6% 77.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2
Jason Crist 66.8% 96.9
Kyle DuVall 65.3% 148.6
Owen Skeete 65.4% 156.8
Carl Smith 65.3% 198.4
Mark Chandler 65.3% 212.6
Jeremy Coughler 65.5% 233.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rorey Hunter 9.7 0.4 1.9 4.2 5.6 7.1 6.8 7.4 6.7 6.2 5.3 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.3 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.0
Jason Crist 13.2 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.4 3.3 4.5 5.1 5.7 5.8 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.1 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.3 2.8 2.1 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.5
Kyle DuVall 25.7 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.6 2.7 3.5 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.8 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.2 3.1
Owen Skeete 28.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.9 2.9 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4
Carl Smith 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.9
Mark Chandler 52.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Jeremy Coughler 71.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2.3% 100.0% 2.3 2.3 1
2 15.8% 100.0% 15.8 15.8 2
3 23.3% 93.6% 0.8 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.5 1.9 1.9 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.5 21.8 3
4 22.2% 87.7% 0.9 1.4 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.5 0.9 1.2 2.7 19.5 4
5 18.3% 30.7% 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7 12.7 5.6 5
6 11.0% 3.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 10.6 0.4 6
7 5.3% 0.4% 0.0 5.3 0.0 7
8 1.5% 1.5 8
9 0.3% 0.3 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
Total 100% 65.3% 2.3 15.8 0.8 3.2 4.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.4 3.6 3.0 3.3 2.4 2.9 34.7 18.1 47.3




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mississippi 91.7% 1.0 0.9
Florida State 91.5% 1.0 0.9
Michigan State 90.9% 1.0 0.9
Columbia 70.8% 1.0 0.7
Virginia Tech 61.7% 1.0 0.6
Oklahoma 60.8% 1.0 0.6
Illinois 47.5% 1.0 0.5
Princeton 19.2% 2.0 0.4
Providence 14.1% 1.0 0.1
Lamar 9.0% 1.0 0.1
Notre Dame 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Wisconsin 7.0% 2.0 0.1
Penn State 3.3% 2.0 0.1
Portland 2.2% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 2.1% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Iowa State 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Duke 0.0% 1.0 0.0
New Mexico 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.0% 1.0 0.0
South Dakota St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 6.1
Minimum 1.0
Maximum 13.0