Binghamton
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,328  Nathaniel Kozyra SR 34:11
1,474  Daryn Hutchings SO 34:23
1,803  Matthew Gill SO 34:49
1,908  Thomas Moshier SO 35:00
1,932  Billy Hector SO 35:02
1,966  Mitch Abrams JR 35:05
2,469  Adam McIe SR 36:14
2,627  Martin O'Connell FR 36:45
National Rank #219 of 312
Northeast Region Rank #30 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nathaniel Kozyra Daryn Hutchings Matthew Gill Thomas Moshier Billy Hector Mitch Abrams Adam McIe Martin O'Connell
Binghamton Meet 09/17 1261 34:31 34:01 34:44 35:46 36:05 35:03 35:50 36:34
Paul Short Invitational (Brown) 10/01 1240 33:45 34:09 34:38 37:12 35:02 35:27 36:05 36:37
UAlbany Invitational 10/15 1248 34:36 34:21 34:59 34:21 35:05 37:27 36:29
America East Conference 10/29 1233 34:08 34:22 34:55 34:45 34:28 35:12 37:55
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 1229 34:32 34:13 34:54 34:17 36:13 34:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.2 928 0.1 0.1 0.4 3.7 81.8 9.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nathaniel Kozyra 153.2
Daryn Hutchings 167.2
Matthew Gill 196.9
Thomas Moshier 207.0
Billy Hector 209.2
Mitch Abrams 211.8
Adam McIe 247.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 3.7% 3.7 29
30 81.8% 81.8 30
31 9.0% 9.0 31
32 3.2% 3.2 32
33 1.4% 1.4 33
34 0.4% 0.4 34
35 0.1% 0.1 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0