Chattanooga
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
809  Paul Stuart SR 33:28
938  Brennan Huber JR 33:39
1,240  gavin Hasty SO 34:03
1,600  Nathan Watson FR 34:33
1,820  John Payne SO 34:51
1,840  Richard Guiry SO 34:53
1,884  Austin Casassa SR 34:57
1,936  trevor Janssen SR 35:02
2,112  Mark Britt SO 35:22
National Rank #188 of 312
South Region Rank #19 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.6%
Top 20 in Regional 93.2%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Paul Stuart Brennan Huber gavin Hasty Nathan Watson John Payne Richard Guiry Austin Casassa trevor Janssen Mark Britt
JSU Foothills Invitational 10/01 1207 33:59 33:44 34:15 34:30 34:51 34:36 35:06 35:49
Front Runner Invitational 10/15 1195 33:49 33:55 34:00 34:11 34:26 34:53 35:10
Southern Conference Championship 10/29 1187 33:24 33:21 34:20 34:30 34:34 34:31 34:45 34:58 35:19
South Region Championships 11/11 1237 33:01 33:24 35:07 36:32 35:44 36:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.4 473 0.1 0.5 1.6 4.2 7.2 10.2 14.7 15.3 13.8 11.3 8.0 6.5 4.4 2.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Paul Stuart 57.7
Brennan Huber 67.3
gavin Hasty 89.4
Nathan Watson 119.9
John Payne 136.9
Richard Guiry 138.0
Austin Casassa 143.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.5% 0.5 10
11 1.6% 1.6 11
12 4.2% 4.2 12
13 7.2% 7.2 13
14 10.2% 10.2 14
15 14.7% 14.7 15
16 15.3% 15.3 16
17 13.8% 13.8 17
18 11.3% 11.3 18
19 8.0% 8.0 19
20 6.5% 6.5 20
21 4.4% 4.4 21
22 2.5% 2.5 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0