Georgia
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
157  Bryan Kamau JR 32:03
208  Austin Sprague JR 32:15
287  Sid Vaughn SR 32:26
519  Daniel Navarro JR 32:57
726  Eric Westog JR 33:20
774  Morgan Malanoski SR 33:25
785  Jon Moses JR 33:26
1,001  Terrell Estime SO 33:44
1,254  Stephen Martinez SO 34:04
1,396  Tyler Jones FR 34:16
1,592  Jimmy Hicks SR 34:33
1,599  Jonathan Pelham FR 34:33
1,747  Ryan Peppenhorst FR 34:44
2,105  Henry Dwyer JR 35:21
National Rank #54 of 312
South Region Rank #5 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 4.7%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 93.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Bryan Kamau Austin Sprague Sid Vaughn Daniel Navarro Eric Westog Morgan Malanoski Jon Moses Terrell Estime Stephen Martinez Tyler Jones Jimmy Hicks
Commadore Classic 09/17 775 31:58 31:59 32:16 33:01 33:03 33:16 33:26 33:51 34:40 34:16
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 791 31:55 32:05 32:08 33:28 33:11 33:15 33:16 33:54 34:14 34:15
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 863 32:08 32:25 32:37 32:38 33:11 33:09 33:29 33:40 33:44 34:16 35:01
SEC Championship 10/28 880 32:01 32:18 32:48 32:46 33:54 34:41 33:42 33:35 34:09 35:01
South Region Championships 11/11 809 32:08 32:34 32:14 32:25 33:00 34:00 33:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 4.7% 28.1 685 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.7
Region Championship 100% 3.9 129 4.7 28.6 45.0 15.6 4.4 1.4 0.4



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Bryan Kamau 42.4% 120.0
Austin Sprague 19.1% 141.3
Sid Vaughn 7.7% 163.5
Daniel Navarro 4.7% 213.0
Eric Westog 4.8% 234.7
Morgan Malanoski 4.7% 238.6
Jon Moses 4.9% 240.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Bryan Kamau 9.8 0.2 0.3 1.4 2.5 4.4 7.6 8.0 9.0 10.4 8.5 8.2 6.0 5.0 4.3 3.7 3.2 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.9 0.8
Austin Sprague 12.9 0.2 0.3 0.9 1.6 3.2 4.7 7.2 8.1 8.4 8.4 8.0 6.7 4.9 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.4 1.6
Sid Vaughn 17.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.5 3.2 4.9 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.0 5.2 5.5 4.7 4.1 3.2 3.8 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.2
Daniel Navarro 33.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.6 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.6 4.0 4.5
Eric Westog 50.3 0.1 0.1 0.2
Morgan Malanoski 54.7 0.1
Jon Moses 55.9 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 4.7% 100.0% 4.7 4.7 2
3 28.6% 0.2% 0.1 28.6 0.1 3
4 45.0% 45.0 4
5 15.6% 15.6 5
6 4.4% 4.4 6
7 1.4% 1.4 7
8 0.4% 0.4 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 4.7% 4.7 0.1 95.3 4.7 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas A&M 43.0% 1.0 0.4
Alabama 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Missouri 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0