Hartford
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,714  Willy Pierce SO 34:42
2,045  Daniel Kyvelos FR 35:14
2,084  Rourk Marlow SR 35:19
2,102  Nurlan Herburger SO 35:21
2,271  Evan Jaworski JR 35:43
2,376  Sean Garrison FR 35:56
2,548  Aedan Hale JR 36:28
2,611  Ryan Harrington FR 36:42
National Rank #246 of 312
Northeast Region Rank #32 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Willy Pierce Daniel Kyvelos Rourk Marlow Nurlan Herburger Evan Jaworski Sean Garrison Aedan Hale Ryan Harrington
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/16 1313 35:53 34:41 35:48 35:37 35:34 35:07 36:50
Ted Owen Invitational 09/24 1314 34:48 34:40 35:27 35:40 36:14 36:34
NEICAAA Championship 10/08 1321 35:25 35:53 35:13 35:05 35:35 36:14
America East Conference 10/29 1322 34:51 34:58 35:38 35:28 36:21 36:52 36:51 36:43
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 34:00 35:31 35:10





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.7 1088 0.4 3.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Willy Pierce 190.5
Daniel Kyvelos 218.4
Rourk Marlow 222.1
Nurlan Herburger 223.3
Evan Jaworski 234.9
Sean Garrison 240.9
Aedan Hale 252.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 0.4% 0.4 30
31 3.7% 3.7 31
32 7.3% 7.3 32
33 14.3% 14.3 33
34 22.4% 22.4 34
35 18.9% 18.9 35
36 14.4% 14.4 36
37 11.6% 11.6 37
38 5.5% 5.5 38
39 1.7% 1.7 39
40 0.1% 0.1 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0